1990
DOI: 10.1021/ie00105a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation and experimental analysis of mass transfer in a liquid-liquid stirred tank extractor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed in this test, the phenomenon of methanol drawdown in oil was practically instantaneous, and the influence of interfacial mass-transfer was considered very small, on the basis of the analysis illustrated in section 3.1; the observed initial reaction rate was therefore assumed to be an acceptable approximation of the actual rate of chemical reaction. The evaluation of the parameters and mass-transfer coefficients contained in the expressions of t T,NP , t T,P and t D,P , derived from refs , is illustrated in the Supporting Information. The Sauter mean diameter ( d 32 ) relative to each configuration at the beginning of the reaction test was estimated on the basis of eq , thus neglecting the evolution of d 32 from the initial value to the stationary value provided by eq . ,,, This choice implies an underestimate of the mass-transfer resistance during the initial part of the reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed in this test, the phenomenon of methanol drawdown in oil was practically instantaneous, and the influence of interfacial mass-transfer was considered very small, on the basis of the analysis illustrated in section 3.1; the observed initial reaction rate was therefore assumed to be an acceptable approximation of the actual rate of chemical reaction. The evaluation of the parameters and mass-transfer coefficients contained in the expressions of t T,NP , t T,P and t D,P , derived from refs , is illustrated in the Supporting Information. The Sauter mean diameter ( d 32 ) relative to each configuration at the beginning of the reaction test was estimated on the basis of eq , thus neglecting the evolution of d 32 from the initial value to the stationary value provided by eq . ,,, This choice implies an underestimate of the mass-transfer resistance during the initial part of the reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information deficiencies with respect to the specific interfacial areas involved in such reactor systems prevents a direct determination of the film transfer coefficient, although values can be estimated using system-specific correlations (4,5,15,16). Information deficiencies with respect to the specific interfacial areas involved in such reactor systems prevents a direct determination of the film transfer coefficient, although values can be estimated using system-specific correlations (4,5,15,16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations exceeding a factor of 2 have been noted in a few instances however (10,13,14 Liquid-liquid mass transfer in packed columns, in slurry systems, and in dispersed liquid-liquid systems is typically described in terms of a lumped mass transfer coefficient, which is given in turn by the product of the film transfer coefficient and the specific interfacial area. Information deficiencies with respect to the specific interfacial areas involved in such reactor systems prevents a direct determination of the film transfer coefficient, although values can be estimated using system-specific correlations (4,5,15,16). In contrast, mass transfer in non-dispersed liquid-liquid systems having easily quantifiable specific interfacial areas can be described more directly in terms of film mass transfer coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the solutes between the NAPL and the aqueous phase is governed by the hydrodynamic conditions and the molecular diffusion of solutes in both the phases and the interphases. The kinetics of solute dissolution from NAPLs has been extensively studied, and several mass transfer models derived theoretically and empirically have been previously published (Ahn and Lee 1990; Alshafie and Ghoshal 2004;Benhabib et al 2006;Cho et al 2005;Chrysikopoulos et al 2003;Ghoshal et al 2004;Lee 2004;Lee et al 2007;Mukherji et al 1997;Schluep et al 2001). Critical reviews of recent work on NAPL dissolution in porous media have indicated that the most promising research progress, in addition to exploitation of combined large-scale field and computational investigations (Broholm et al 2005), may be determined by the clarification of the role of nonideal NAPL mixtures and identification of intra-NAPL mass transfer processes (Khachikian and Harmon 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%