2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating yield stress variation along hydraulic fracture face enhances polymer cleanup modeling in tight gas reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gas production is affected by the length of the natural fractures, and relatively long fractures with high hydraulic fracturing conductivity are required to obtain high gas production. ,, Gas reservoirs with a high natural density and shorter primary fractures are superior . There is a discernible linear relationship between the cumulative gas production and fracture permeability .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas production is affected by the length of the natural fractures, and relatively long fractures with high hydraulic fracturing conductivity are required to obtain high gas production. ,, Gas reservoirs with a high natural density and shorter primary fractures are superior . There is a discernible linear relationship between the cumulative gas production and fracture permeability .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lithology of Lucaogou Formation in this paper is similar to the core samples used in Chen's model [42], we introduce his formulas, Equations (14)- (16), for calculating proppant embedment that allows for modifying the stress-dependent porosity and permeability [42] with the results shown in Figure 13.…”
Section: Impact Of Proppant Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Equations 14- (16), w f0 is fracture width before embedment, m; h is the proppant embedment, m; η = 2.1 × 10 −5 , λ = 2.8, when the proppant is 20/40-mesh; and η = 1.6 × 10 −5 , λ = 3.1, when the proppant is 30/60-mesh. Fracture compressibility, KPa -1 2×10 -6 2×10 -5 2×10 -4 Figure 6.…”
Section: Impact Of Proppant Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations