1995
DOI: 10.2514/3.12470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating waves in flows by Runge-Kutta and compact difference schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(30) indicates that the exact solution of (23) may be decomposed in both an spatial and a temporal part. With a Runge-Kutta method, we approximate the temporal part of (23) with a Taylor expansion.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Complete Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(30) indicates that the exact solution of (23) may be decomposed in both an spatial and a temporal part. With a Runge-Kutta method, we approximate the temporal part of (23) with a Taylor expansion.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Complete Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following [30], the numerical dissipation is given by the magnitude of the amplification factor. When jrðzÞj 6 1 the method is stable.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Complete Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplification factor of Equation ( 13) discretized by the Runge-Kutta method can be obtained as follows [13]:…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, multi-stage single step schemes are parasite free, and therefore present interesting possibilities. High-order Runge-Kutta multi-stage approximations have been used with success (Lele 1992, Zing 1995; Yu et al (1995) examined various combinations of Runge-Kutta time-marching schemes and compact spatial differencing. As a rule, the higher-order varieties of both time and space discretizations provided the best overall performance from the point of view of dispersion and dissipation characteristics, although the authors recommend using a fourth-order rather than a sixth-order compact spatial operator since the lower-accuracy method provided nearly equivalent results at lower computational cost.…”
Section: Time Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%