2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating the ultrafiltration of whey proteins isolate using a mixture model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the four enzymes could catalyze whey protein cross‐linking, the relative flux levels were not at all increased compared to the control. It was assumed that many large proteins were deposited on the membrane surface forming tight cake resistance under transmembrane pressure, which made membrane filtration difficult (Haribabu et al., 2020). In this study, the TG + tyrosinase catalyzed whey protein cross‐linking could increase the membrane filtration efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the four enzymes could catalyze whey protein cross‐linking, the relative flux levels were not at all increased compared to the control. It was assumed that many large proteins were deposited on the membrane surface forming tight cake resistance under transmembrane pressure, which made membrane filtration difficult (Haribabu et al., 2020). In this study, the TG + tyrosinase catalyzed whey protein cross‐linking could increase the membrane filtration efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiphase mixture models are not restricted to classical industrial applications. Haribabu et al [9] used the mixture model to examine the filtration process of a whey protein. Milk is another example of a dispersed mixture, where water and oil represent the continuous and the dispersed phases, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those models have been used to predict fluxes, pressure profiles, concentration distributions, shear stresses, and mass transfer as well as accumulation phenomena. Respective models are available for different setups, such as dead-end modules [3,8,17,18], flat sheet cross-flow rigs [19,20], hollow fiber modules [7,21] and multistage SPTFF units [22,23]. In the last two decades, the description of the accumulation phenomena during UF developed from a static, mostly qualitative to a dynamic quantitative analysis in order to better understand the important process limitations resulting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Aguirre-Montesdeoca et al [19] protein (BSA) and accompanying ions, they predicted the permeate flux, volume fractions of BSA on the membrane surface and the osmotic pressure difference over the membrane under different pH and ionic strengths in the feed solution. Haribabu et al [17] pointed out the importance to show the non-uniformity of parameters like local transmembrane pressure, flow velocity, and concentration at different positions of the membrane in the cross-flow filtration. They advised using a multi-dimensional numerical treatment instead of a one dimensional or area-averaged models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%