a series of consecutive links in the form of a corridor or an arterial, and (b) the network level, in which priority is given to transit on any link in the network.A summary of the transit priority studies and their characteristics carried out at the local and network level is presented in Table 1. Bly et al. (4) explored transit priority at the local level. An exclusive bus lane was introduced to a link in different conditions, and the associated impacts on the rest of the network were assessed by running a sensitivity analysis. Black (2) presented a model for RSA on urban arterials. The model evaluated several predefined scenarios with a performance measure (total user travel time), and all the space allocation was introduced at corridor level. Although a mode choice model was applied to the studied corridor, the secondary network effects of road space change such as route choice were ignored. In another attempt, Jepson and Ferreira (5) assessed different road space priority such as bus lane and setbacks on the basis of delays.Currie et al. (7) presented a comprehensive review of the studies on RSA. Having compared the performance measures in the literature, they then proposed an approach to evaluation of transit priority projects. Their approach considered a comprehensive list of impacts such as travel time, travel time variability, and initial and maintenance cost. An analysis method for a long arterial was given by Eichler and Daganzo (6) following the concept of intermittent bus lanes (10,11).All these studies focused on providing priority at the local level. Therefore, the range of priority alternatives was limited and would not necessarily result in the best possible RSA. Furthermore, all of the studies at the local level proposed and utilized an evaluation method that requires the RSA as input to the evaluation framework. Despite this limitation, the local level is accounted for in most of the research carried out on transit priority. That is probably because studies at this level are simpler to carry out and justify at the local level, need less administrative coordination between transportation authorities, and are less costly to implement. At the network level it can be argued that much research on the transit network design problem (12-15) would seek the optimal combination of many variables such as bus routes, frequencies, and timetables, and therefore they could be considered as solutions to the RSA. A few researchers have included exclusive lanes in the network design process (16). However, since there is already an operational transit network in many cities, rearrangement of the network routes would require public acceptance and entail significant cost.Waterson et al. (8) gave an evaluation approach for a given priority scenario at the network level. The approach considered rerouting, retiming, modal change, and trip suppression. A similar evaluation approach was carried out by using a microsimulation (9). However, such approaches can be used as evaluation tools and cannot provide the best com...