2023
DOI: 10.3390/jmse11020343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating the Impacts of an Applied Dynamic Adaptive Pathways Plan Using an Agent-Based Model: A Tauranga City, New Zealand, Case Study

Abstract: Climate change and relative sea-level rise (RSLR) will increasingly expose coastal cities to coastal flooding, erosion, pluvial and fluvial flooding, episodic storm-tide flooding and eventually, permanent inundation. Tools are needed to support adaptive management approaches that allow society to adapt incrementally by making decisions now without creating path dependency and compromising decision-making options in the future. We developed an agent-based model that integrates climate-related physical hazard dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our current research supports this type of complex, inclusive, and grounded adaptation decision-making. Drawing on the most frequently used indicators of social vulnerability to climate change that are found within the indices reviewed for the Resilience Challenge work described above and our combined 50 years of social and climate research in coastal communities [123,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149], we developed a framework for creating personas. The framework (Figure 2 below) comprises a series of identity markers (such as socio-economic status, education, race, renter, or homeowner) that contribute to social vulnerability and that we call "positionality", a range of adaptive capacities, skills, or assets that offset vulnerability, and a category for beliefs and values.…”
Section: Reflection: State Of the Field And Applying New Directions F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our current research supports this type of complex, inclusive, and grounded adaptation decision-making. Drawing on the most frequently used indicators of social vulnerability to climate change that are found within the indices reviewed for the Resilience Challenge work described above and our combined 50 years of social and climate research in coastal communities [123,[136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149], we developed a framework for creating personas. The framework (Figure 2 below) comprises a series of identity markers (such as socio-economic status, education, race, renter, or homeowner) that contribute to social vulnerability and that we call "positionality", a range of adaptive capacities, skills, or assets that offset vulnerability, and a category for beliefs and values.…”
Section: Reflection: State Of the Field And Applying New Directions F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sequential adaptation with a multirisk assessment [26] enables a flexible set of interventions to enhance coastal resilience, avoid TPs and, in the approach here proposed, demonstrating the shared benefits of nature-based solutions (NbS) or living shorelines. The developed dynamic adaptation plans [27] consider climate and management evolution, proposing a set of actionable interventions and estimating their contribution to risk reduction in terms of key and robust physical parameters, simpler to project than ecologic or socioeconomic ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such consensus and the convergence of stakeholder criteria are based on an explicit assessment of synergies and tradeoffs for the proposed coastal interventions, including estimations of costs, impacts and carbon footprint. Based on the proposed dynamic adaptation plans and risk assessments [28][29][30], the actionable interventions can be assessed and ranked according to risk reduction, estimated as a function of key physical parameters that integrate the complex social-ecological dynamics of the coastal system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%