2011
DOI: 10.1134/s207004821101008x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating the Holtsmark distribution by the Monte Carlo method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This expression, frequently used in numerical studies in the cosmological context (see Pietronero et al 2002;Bottaccio et al 2002, and references therein) still bears the same problems of its full integral form, being non-normalizable and with divergent standard deviation. Typically, in order to avoid a diverging cumulative distribution and diverging energy density of the fluctuating field (Kozlitin 2011), when sampling H(F) in numerical schemes one is forced to fix bona fide cut-offs at large and small F.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression, frequently used in numerical studies in the cosmological context (see Pietronero et al 2002;Bottaccio et al 2002, and references therein) still bears the same problems of its full integral form, being non-normalizable and with divergent standard deviation. Typically, in order to avoid a diverging cumulative distribution and diverging energy density of the fluctuating field (Kozlitin 2011), when sampling H(F) in numerical schemes one is forced to fix bona fide cut-offs at large and small F.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter expression, frequently used in numerical studies in the cosmological context (see Pietronero et al 2002;Bottaccio et al 2002, and references therein) still bears the same problems of its full integral form, being non-normalizable and with divergent standard deviation. Typically, in order to avoid a diverging cumulative distribution and diverging energy density of the fluctuating field (Kozlitin 2011), when sampling H(F) in numerical schemes one is forced to fix bona fide cut-offs at large and and small F.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often believed that it is not possible to obtain a rather compact expression of S(β) (or H(β)) in terms of known functions (see for instance page 183 of the book "Atomic Physics in Hot Plasmas", by D. Salzmann: "There is no analytical solution for the integral in terms of known elementary or special functions" [4]). There are many interesting works about the numerical computation of the Holtsmark distribution, for instance using Monte Carlo methods [16] or rational-fraction approximations [17]. The peak value of S(β) is…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%