2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating the formation of η Carinae’s surrounding nebula through unstable triple evolution and stellar merger-induced eruption

Abstract: η Carinae is an extraordinary massive star famous for its 19th century Great Eruption and the surrounding Homunculus nebula ejected in that event. The cause of this eruption has been the centre of a long-standing mystery. Recent observations, including light-echo spectra of the eruption, suggest that it most likely resulted from a stellar merger in an unstable triple system. Here we present a detailed set of theoretical calculations for this scenario, from the dynamics of unstable triple systems and the mass e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is also a large structure around the pinched "waist" of the bipolar lobes of HR Car's nebula at low velocities that could be interpreted as an equatorial "skirt"-like feature (Figure 5), similar to the one observed in η Car (Zethson et al 1999). Competing models for the eruptive mass loss that could lead to such nebula include super-Eddington winds (e.g., Owocki et al 2017), accretion onto a companion star (e.g., Kashi & Soker 2010), pulsational pair-instability events (e.g., Woosley 2017), and the merger of two massive stars (e.g., Portegies Zwart & van den Heuvel 2016, Hirai et al 2021). However, HR Car is a factor of at least five times less massive in terms of both stellar and nebular mass and the orbital parameters are substantially different.…”
Section: The Circumstellar Nebulasupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In addition, there is also a large structure around the pinched "waist" of the bipolar lobes of HR Car's nebula at low velocities that could be interpreted as an equatorial "skirt"-like feature (Figure 5), similar to the one observed in η Car (Zethson et al 1999). Competing models for the eruptive mass loss that could lead to such nebula include super-Eddington winds (e.g., Owocki et al 2017), accretion onto a companion star (e.g., Kashi & Soker 2010), pulsational pair-instability events (e.g., Woosley 2017), and the merger of two massive stars (e.g., Portegies Zwart & van den Heuvel 2016, Hirai et al 2021). However, HR Car is a factor of at least five times less massive in terms of both stellar and nebular mass and the orbital parameters are substantially different.…”
Section: The Circumstellar Nebulasupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The X-ray flux curve, followed over the past four orbital cycles has consistently reached minimum at the same orbital phase (Corcoran et al 2017;Espinoza Galeas et al 2021) to within a fraction of a day (Teodoro et al 2016). Hirai et al (2021) suggested that η Car was a three body system prior to the Great Eruption, an if so, we estimate a maximum residual apsidal motion of 3°per 5.54 yr orbit. 3.…”
Section: Changes In Fuv Flux In the Long Termmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…η Car is a unique massive binary system that underwent two major events, the very energetic Great Eruption in the 1840s and the Lesser Eruption in the 1890s, expelling massive amounts of ejecta (≈40 M e , Morris et al 2017) and yet has survived as a binary with a primary (≈100 M e ) and a hot secondary (≈40 M e ). Whether the events were due to a near-supernova event or a merger from triple to binary (Portegies Zwart & van den Heuvel 2016;Hirai et al 2021), we do not know, but gathering information about this dynamically changing system can only lead to new understanding of the evolution of massive stars in multiple stellar systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the GE ejected > 15 M following Morris et al (1999) and Smith et al (2003) or > 45 M following Morris et al (2017) -using a full radiative transfer model with a far more chemically realistic dust librarythe luminosity of the central star should have dropped by a large amount, unless it was compensated by some process. This favours the scenario of a merger in a triple system (Portegies Zwart & van den Heuvel 2016;Smith et al 2018;Hirai et al 2020) over a massive wind ejection as the mechanism for the GE, since the primary star would have been mixed internally in a merger, bringing fresh fuel to its central core.…”
Section: Consequences Of the Disappearance Of The Coronagraphmentioning
confidence: 95%