2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating the dust content of galaxies: successes and failures

Abstract: We present full volume cosmological simulations using the moving-mesh code AREPO to study the coevolution of dust and galaxies. We extend the dust model in AREPO to include thermal sputtering of grains and investigate the evolution of the dust mass function, the cosmic distribution of dust beyond the interstellar medium, and the dependence of dust-to-stellar mass ratio on galactic properties. The simulated dust mass function is well-described by a Schechter fit and lies closest to observations at z = 0. The ra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
181
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
(321 reference statements)
17
181
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other physics: Additional physical processes considered in some cosmological simulations of galaxy formation are, for example, dust physics [265][266][267][268][269][270][271][272][273] , thermal conduction 188,225,[274][275][276][277][278] , and viscosity [279][280][281][282] . Dust has typically been neglected in galaxy formation simulations since it contributes only about ∼ 1% to the mass budget of the interstellar medium.…”
Section: Radiation Hydrodynamics Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other physics: Additional physical processes considered in some cosmological simulations of galaxy formation are, for example, dust physics [265][266][267][268][269][270][271][272][273] , thermal conduction 188,225,[274][275][276][277][278] , and viscosity [279][280][281][282] . Dust has typically been neglected in galaxy formation simulations since it contributes only about ∼ 1% to the mass budget of the interstellar medium.…”
Section: Radiation Hydrodynamics Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popping et al 2017). A disagreement on the sources of dust production is also present: Popping et al (2017), McKinnon et al (2017), Aoyama et al (2018), assume that SN Ia can produce dust, while the remaining models are more conservative and exclude these supernovae as dust producers. Finally, dustyGadget is the only code that explicitly accounts for the contribution of PISN at the highest redshifts.…”
Section: Reference Theoretical Models and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green empty squares and black asterisks 12 In accordance with the WMAP-7 cosmology adopted in our simulation the cosmic critical density at z = 0 is ρ c,0 ≈ 2.775 × 10 11 M ⊙ h 2 cMpc −3 . are values at z 4 taken from Aoyama et al (2018) and McKinnon et al (2017), respectively.…”
Section: Cosmic Dust Density Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Khakhaleva-Li & Gnedin (2016) have noted, the details of dust production and destruction may have important implications for the UV and IR properties of simulated galaxies, especially in lowmetallicity galaxies at high redshift. It would thus be useful to perform an analysis similar to ours using simulations that include a detailed treatment of the relevant dust production and destruction channels (e.g., McKinnon et al 2016aMcKinnon et al , 2016b.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%