Simulating Indonesian fuel subsidy reform: a social accounting matrix analysis

Abstract

The debate over phasing out fuel subsidies in Indonesia is quite intense. Recent studies pointed out an unfair distribution of subsidies. Besides this, the burden of fuel subsidies to Indonesian government is expected to increasingly continue in parallel with rising fuel consumption as well as international oil prices. However, recent experiences indicated that phasing out the fuel subsidy could potentially result in adverse effects in the economy. Then, the need for comprehensive economy-wide analyses in order to reveal diverse impacts of these subsidies, has emerged. The main objective of this study is to estimate the impacts of fuel subsidies from the economic, social, and environmental perspective, and to propose policy options for a subsidy reform. For this purpose, a social accounting matrix model is employed to simulate the impact analysis. Scenarios including reallocation of subsidy to either other sectors (sectoral subsidy) or income groups (target subsidy) are simulated and the social, economic and environmental impacts of these scenarios are presented. The results show that reallocation of fuel subsidy to other sectors will be able to positively increase the overall economic development, while compromising environmental aspects. The direct reallocation of subsidy to the low income households, on the other hand, will slow down overall economic development but show a positive result for social welfare.

Initial location selection of electric vehicles charging infrastructure in urban city through clustering algorithm

“…The government regulates the fuel price. This condition leads to fiscal pressure because of an increase in fuel subsidies [25]. In the context of EVs transition, due to its market size and fuel subsidies, Indonesia has the potential to adopt EVs technology in the future transportation sector.…”

Implications of Fuel Subsidy Removal on the Nigerian Economy

“…Dartanto (2013) examined the relationship between existing fuel subsidies and fiscal balance in Indonesia between 1998 and 2013 and found that removing 25 percent of fuel subsidies increased poverty by 0.259 percentage points while 100 percent removal of fuel subsidies and the reallocation of 50 percent of them to government spending decreased poverty by 0.277 percentage points. Fathurrahman et al (2017) showed that the reallocation of subsidy payments to low-income households could slow down economic development but improve social welfare. However, removing fuel subsidy usually comes with the promise of using the money saved from subsidy to undertake targeted reform.…”

Energy subsidy reform evaluation research – reviews in Iran

“…In addition to efficiency improvements, removing fossil fuel subsidies may encourage innovation and modernization, which make the firms more competitive 53 . Removing energy subsidies and reallocating a certain proportion of them to economic sectors reduces total emissions besides an improvement in energy efficiency 54 . However, reallocation of a share of these subsidies to renewable energies not only improves the economic performance and socioeconomic welfare, both in the short and long runs, but also helps to optimize the energy system by making the energy consumption structure cleaner, improving energy efficiency, and addressing the problem of imbalanced distribution and consumption of energy 55–59 .…”