2014
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-631-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating high-latitude permafrost regions by the JSBACH terrestrial ecosystem model

Abstract: Abstract. The current version of JSBACH incorporates phenomena specific to high latitudes: freeze/thaw processes, coupling thermal and hydrological processes in a layered soil scheme, defining a multilayer snow representation and an insulating moss cover. Evaluations using comprehensive Arctic data sets show comparable results at the site, basin, continental and circumarctic scales. Such comparisons highlight the need to include processes relevant to high-latitude systems in order to capture the dynamics, and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
200
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
7
200
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the vegetation cover along the geoelectrical profile is sparse, its influence in maintaining temperatures below freezing point can be seen using the electrical method and could be verified by eye inspection (at least in the zone where some stainless electrodes were forced into the ground). The spatial difference in the geographical distribution of the moss cover brings an additional heterogeneity to the soil thermal properties and dynamics in a small area (Ekici et al, 2014). This result confirms other observations in other regions with permafrost which show that vegetation cover and, in particular, mosses are natural insulators and maintain the ground temperature lower than if there were no mosses (Sharkhuu and Sharkhuu, 2012).…”
Section: Permafrost Distribution Based On Geophysical Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the vegetation cover along the geoelectrical profile is sparse, its influence in maintaining temperatures below freezing point can be seen using the electrical method and could be verified by eye inspection (at least in the zone where some stainless electrodes were forced into the ground). The spatial difference in the geographical distribution of the moss cover brings an additional heterogeneity to the soil thermal properties and dynamics in a small area (Ekici et al, 2014). This result confirms other observations in other regions with permafrost which show that vegetation cover and, in particular, mosses are natural insulators and maintain the ground temperature lower than if there were no mosses (Sharkhuu and Sharkhuu, 2012).…”
Section: Permafrost Distribution Based On Geophysical Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This increase in the density distribution of the mosses coincides with the increase of the electrical resistivity and thickness of the ground high electrical resistivities. The presence of a moss cover affects the soil heat transfer through thermal and hydrological insulation depending on the thickness and wetness of the moss (Ekici et al, 2014). Even though the vegetation cover along the geoelectrical profile is sparse, its influence in maintaining temperatures below freezing point can be seen using the electrical method and could be verified by eye inspection (at least in the zone where some stainless electrodes were forced into the ground).…”
Section: Permafrost Distribution Based On Geophysical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To allow liquid water to coexist with ice below 0 • C, a freezing point depression is included in the model and the maximum liquid water content for soil temperatures T s below T 0 = 273.15 K is formulated as (e.g. Cox et al, 1999;Niu and Yang, 2006;Ekici et al, 2014):…”
Section: Snow and Soil Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in permafrost physics such as including soil freezing, organic soil properties, improved snow schemes, more realistic soil depths and physical impacts of mosses and lichens (Gouttevin et al, 2012;Lawrence et al, 2008;Ekici et al, 2014;Paquin and Sushama, 2015;Chadburn et al, 2015a, b;Porada et al, 2016) mean that the rate of permafrost thaw is now more realistic in many of the land surface components of ESMs. Adding a vertical representation of soil carbon is now required to enable a representation of permafrost carbon in ESMs (Tian et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%