2011
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20111243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating daily water temperatures of the Klamath River under dam removal and climate change scenarios

Abstract: Temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) may be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (°F) as follows: °F=(1.8×°C)+32. Temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) may be converted to degrees Celsius (°C) as follows: °C=(°F-32)/1.8. Datums Coordinate information is referenced to North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83). Altitude, as used in this report, refers to distance above the vertical datum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the positive relationship between temperature differential and refuge use, which could be attributed to fish gaining greater relative physiological benefit from refuges created by cooler tributaries, emphasizes the importance of maintaining good riparian habitat along stream corridors. These considerations are particularly relevant on the Klamath River, given the planned removal of the four lowest mainstem dams in 2020, which would open up over 550 km of upstream habitat for anadromous salmonids, and is projected to decrease mainstem temperatures by approximately 2-48C in late summer and early fall months (Goodman et al 2011, Perry et al 2011. Klamath River mainstem temperature increased at approximately 0.58C per decade between 1962 and 2001 (Bartholow 2005), and additional future warming will likely cause the number of days when temperatures exceed 258C to increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the positive relationship between temperature differential and refuge use, which could be attributed to fish gaining greater relative physiological benefit from refuges created by cooler tributaries, emphasizes the importance of maintaining good riparian habitat along stream corridors. These considerations are particularly relevant on the Klamath River, given the planned removal of the four lowest mainstem dams in 2020, which would open up over 550 km of upstream habitat for anadromous salmonids, and is projected to decrease mainstem temperatures by approximately 2-48C in late summer and early fall months (Goodman et al 2011, Perry et al 2011. Klamath River mainstem temperature increased at approximately 0.58C per decade between 1962 and 2001 (Bartholow 2005), and additional future warming will likely cause the number of days when temperatures exceed 258C to increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19.2) for each of three climate scenarios (min, median and max) for each GCM (Table 19.1, Perry et al 2011). …”
Section: Environmental Data Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19.1). The ensemble includes: (1) GCMs to predict future air temperatures and precipitation patterns (Table 19.1) and a fine-scale climate change model to predict future stream temperatures and discharge in the Klamath River (Perry et al 2011), (2) polychaete models to predict changes in invertebrate host populations under different discharge scenarios (Wright et al 2014;Alexander et al unpub. data), (3) a degree-day model to predict C. shasta spore viability and number of annual generations under different temperature scenarios (Chiaramonte 2013), and (4) an epidemiological model to predict how C. shasta dynamics may respond to future climate scenarios (Ray 2013;Ray et al unpub.…”
Section: Case Study: Ceratonova Shasta and The Future Klamath River Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations