2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating chemistry–aerosol–cloud–radiation–climate feedbacks over the continental U.S. using the online-coupled Weather Research Forecasting Model with chemistry (WRF/Chem)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
143
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
14
143
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For daily episodes on 19th and 29th January a local increase in solar radiation appears of up to 10.0 W m -2 . A similar effect of atmospheric heating by up to 26.0 W m -2 was noticed by Zhang et al (2010) over the ocean and western US Changes in air temperature in the atmosphere cause changes in monthly mean PBLH. Monthly mean PBLH changes in the range of ±5 m for 58 % of the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For daily episodes on 19th and 29th January a local increase in solar radiation appears of up to 10.0 W m -2 . A similar effect of atmospheric heating by up to 26.0 W m -2 was noticed by Zhang et al (2010) over the ocean and western US Changes in air temperature in the atmosphere cause changes in monthly mean PBLH. Monthly mean PBLH changes in the range of ±5 m for 58 % of the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…ZHANG et al (2010) applied WRF-Chem over North America at a 36 km 9 36 km resolution to examine the influence of direct and indirect feedback effects on meteorology and photolysis rate. Despite the relatively coarse resolution, the results of ZHANG et al (2010) indicated the potential importance of the aerosol feedbacks on a regional scale, even at a time scale of a month. Similar studies on feedback effects have been undertaken for Europe by FORKEL et al (2012), where the WRF-Chem model was implemented at a resolution of 22.5 9 22.5 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects have been observed in the past (Kaufman and Fraser, 1997;Rosenfeld and Woodley,1999). New studies have been developed to study the multiple interactions between meteorology and chemistry in the atmosphere, for example aerosol-cloudradiation feedback effects (Zhang, 2008;Zhang et al, 2010;Forkel et al, 2012) and interactions between temperature, gas-phase chemistry and aerosols (Baklanov et al, 2014) We can also find opposite effects of the aerosols on the meteorological variables, for example the precipitation. Aerosols can decrease solar radiation on surface, so less heat is available for water evaporation and a reduction of precipitation is observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WRF/chem has been used in simulating the effect of elevated sources on aerosol forcing and cloud-aerosol interaction in summertime over northeastern North America (Chapman et al, 2009); the three days of studies revealed a domain-averaged reduction of 5 W/m 2 in the mean daytime incoming solar radiation, and the rainfall was increased by 31%. Another study focused on the chemistry-aerosol-cloud-radiation-climate feedbacks over the continental United States (Zhang et al, 2010a). The result of that study indicated a decrease of the incoming solar radiation, temperature and PBL height; increased amounts of small CCN that inhibit precipitation; and decreases and increases of NO 2 photolysis in different places over the United States (U.S.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Amazon and Indonesian rainforests, soot and smoke form wildfires can suppress the warm rain-forming process by making CCN smaller and quantity (Warner, 1968;Kaufman and Fraser, 1997;Rosenfeld, 1999;Zhang et al, 2010). The significant formation of CCN by aerosols arriving downwind from urban and lager factories areas, especially paper mills, will increase precipitation (Cerveny et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%