1994
DOI: 10.1080/02693799408902011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating and mapping spatial complexity using multi-scale techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The monotonic decrease in image variance with increasing pixel size exhibited by the rescaled series conforms to a well-established theory for spatial aggregation of geographic data (De Cola, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The monotonic decrease in image variance with increasing pixel size exhibited by the rescaled series conforms to a well-established theory for spatial aggregation of geographic data (De Cola, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, before we can use rescaled data to infer fields of biogeophysical values, a pressing question must be addressed: ''How good is the correspondence between the actual, observed data and the simulated, rescaled data?'' Studying how the spatial resolution affects observed spatial structure can provide insights into both the process of rescaling and spatial pattern dynamics, which is crucial to understand cross-scale phenomena (De Cola, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture spatial heterogeneity effectively using remotely sensed data, its resolution must be high enough to characterize the scale of the typical length of interest [9] In this work, relatively high resolution data, Landsat 5 (i.e., TM imagery with 30 m spatial resolution) was used, as it is fine enough to describe the length scale of agricultural landscapes [10]. The image dataset was acquired at the best time in the growing season for crops (i.e., 31/8/2006).…”
Section: Study Area and Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, by integrating the spatial variability and the autocorrelation extent, D c represents the mean extent of the image spatial structures at the landscape scale. Defining an appropriate pixel size at which the spatial structure and the spatial variability could be captured, is therefore possible, based on D c , if the sampling space (i.e., spatial resolution in this study) is less than D c /2, according to the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem [10]. In this study, we have the smallest D c , i.e., 164 m, occurring in Site 1, thus the largest pixel size of monitoring remotely-sensed data should be less than 82 m [9](i.e., half of the smallest D c ) at the data acquisition time (i.e., 31/8/2006).…”
Section: B Omnidirection Heterogeneity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let there also be a set of points Ao = {(i, j): i = 1, ... ,N;j = 1, ... , T} at N locations and Ttime instants, and let Zo(i, j) be an Nx T data matrix of values recorded atAo C A (Knorr-Held and Besag 1998;De Cola 1994). In the case of a disease, for example, a fine-scale representation of the data might be an animated multifractal "dust" of infection events (x, t) in space-time (Mandelbrot 1983) or a detailed geographic timeline tracing the continuous location of each infected organism in space (Haggett 2000).…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%