Abstract:Gentle stroking touches are rated most pleasant when applied at a velocity of between 1-10 cm/s. Such touches are considered highly relevant in social interactions. Here, we investigate whether stroking sensations generated by a vibrotactile array can produce similar pleasantness responses, with the ultimate goal of using this type of haptic display in technology mediated social touch. A study was conducted in which participants received vibrotactile stroking stimuli of different velocities and intensities, ap… Show more
“…This was based on CT afferent properties discovered from microneurography studies (Nordin, ; Vallbo et al, ). Furthermore, the velocities selected were also those established from investigations of CT afferents in the forearm (Ackerley, Carlsson, et al, ; Croy et al, ; Hielscher & Mahar, ; Huisman, Frederiks, vanErp, & Heylen, ; Jönsson et al, ; Kass‐Iliyya et al, ) and face (Ackerley, Carlsson, et al, ). The findings from the present study complement CT afferent research.…”
Background
Somatosensory assessment within the orofacial region may be performed using highly standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST). However, the function of the C‐tactile (CT) afferent, a nerve fibre linked to the perception of pleasant touch, is usually not evaluated. Furthermore, the perception of unpleasantness is also rarely assessed, a dimension not only limited to a painful experience. Therefore, the primary aim was to apply standardized QST stimuli as well as standardized pleasant stimuli and evaluate their potential capacity for evocation of perceived pain, pleasant and unpleasant sensations in the facial region.
Methods
Twenty‐one female participants underwent QST as per the protocol derived from the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain. For the first time, two modified protocols were used to investigate stimuli for perceived pleasantness and unpleasantness.
Results
Thermal stimuli provided separate thresholds for each sensation. From certain mechanical stimuli (e.g., vibration), overlap between the perceived sensations of pleasantness and unpleasantness was identified. It was not possible to evoke only an unpleasant sensation without a painful contribution, and both these sensations increased significantly when utilizing an increasing pinprick force (p < 0.011). Between dynamic stimuli, the brush was rated as significantly more pleasant than the cotton wool tip (p = 0.015). A quadratic model provided the best fit for velocity against mean pleasantness ratings (R2 = 0.62 ± 0.08), supporting previous CT afferent literature to some extent.
Conclusion
Stimuli were generally not isolated to one sensation, highlighting the multidimensional construct of stimulus perception and the need for scales to capture this.
Significance
The battery of QST tests from the DFNS protocol has been modified to investigate pleasant and unpleasant sensations. This allows the evaluation of psychophysical properties across standardized dimensions to provide a thorough view of somatosensory function and to better understand the affective spectrum of somatosensory function.
“…This was based on CT afferent properties discovered from microneurography studies (Nordin, ; Vallbo et al, ). Furthermore, the velocities selected were also those established from investigations of CT afferents in the forearm (Ackerley, Carlsson, et al, ; Croy et al, ; Hielscher & Mahar, ; Huisman, Frederiks, vanErp, & Heylen, ; Jönsson et al, ; Kass‐Iliyya et al, ) and face (Ackerley, Carlsson, et al, ). The findings from the present study complement CT afferent research.…”
Background
Somatosensory assessment within the orofacial region may be performed using highly standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST). However, the function of the C‐tactile (CT) afferent, a nerve fibre linked to the perception of pleasant touch, is usually not evaluated. Furthermore, the perception of unpleasantness is also rarely assessed, a dimension not only limited to a painful experience. Therefore, the primary aim was to apply standardized QST stimuli as well as standardized pleasant stimuli and evaluate their potential capacity for evocation of perceived pain, pleasant and unpleasant sensations in the facial region.
Methods
Twenty‐one female participants underwent QST as per the protocol derived from the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain. For the first time, two modified protocols were used to investigate stimuli for perceived pleasantness and unpleasantness.
Results
Thermal stimuli provided separate thresholds for each sensation. From certain mechanical stimuli (e.g., vibration), overlap between the perceived sensations of pleasantness and unpleasantness was identified. It was not possible to evoke only an unpleasant sensation without a painful contribution, and both these sensations increased significantly when utilizing an increasing pinprick force (p < 0.011). Between dynamic stimuli, the brush was rated as significantly more pleasant than the cotton wool tip (p = 0.015). A quadratic model provided the best fit for velocity against mean pleasantness ratings (R2 = 0.62 ± 0.08), supporting previous CT afferent literature to some extent.
Conclusion
Stimuli were generally not isolated to one sensation, highlighting the multidimensional construct of stimulus perception and the need for scales to capture this.
Significance
The battery of QST tests from the DFNS protocol has been modified to investigate pleasant and unpleasant sensations. This allows the evaluation of psychophysical properties across standardized dimensions to provide a thorough view of somatosensory function and to better understand the affective spectrum of somatosensory function.
“…1 Emerging research includes remote, prosthetic and multi-modal interfaces for touch practices between humans, virtual agents, robots (Van Erp and Toet 2015, Huisman 2017). 2 Research on experience of affective touch using vibro-tactile technologies showed that telematic, haptic experiences of slow (1-10 cm/s) gentle stroking of the body, such as caressing, are associated by participants with experiences of affection (Huisman et al 2016). 3 These works can be related to the facial illusion experiment, in which acts of touching a participant's face are mirrored real-time in acts of touching other peoples' faces, visible on a monitor in front of the participant.…”
Can shared experience and dialogue on social touch be orchestrated in playful smart public spaces? In smart city public spaces, in which physical and virtual realities are currently merging, new forms of social connections, interfaces and experiences are being explored. Within art practice, such new connections include new forms of affective social communication with additional social and sensorial connections to enable and enhance empathic, intimate experience in playful smart public space. This chapter explores a novel design for shared intimate experience of playful social touch in three orchestrations of 'Saving Face', in different cultural and geographical environments of smart city (semi-) public spaces, in Beijing, Utrecht, Dessau-Berlin. These orchestrations are purposefully designed to create a radically unfamiliar sensory synthesis to disrupt the perception of 'who sees and who is being seen, who touches and who is being touched'. Participants playfully 'touch themselves and feel being touched, to connect with others on a screen'. All three orchestrations show that shared experience and dialogue on social touch can be mediated by playful smart cities technologies in public spaces, but rely on design of mediated, intimate and exposed forms of 'self-touch for social touch', ambivalent relations, exposure of dialogue and hosting.
“…We demonstrate the use of tactile interactions across different devices, by detecting static and dynamic touches on a touch-screen based mobile device and a novel wearable touch-sensor. These touches are synthesized on a linear array of vibration motors using phantom haptic sensations [1,12,11]. Our method demonstrates that different input methods can be used for generating similar vibrotactile sensations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this demo we introduce a method for the detection and generation of touches, including stroking touches. An optimized method for rendering vibrotactile stroking touches based on the work of [1,12,11,13] is used as output. A linear array of four Precision Microdrives PicoVibe 306-117 vibration motors is worn on the forearm to apply vibrotactile stimulation (see Figure 1).…”
We demonstrate a method that allows two users to communicate remotely using their sense of touch by dynamically applying vibrotactile feedback to one user's forearm using two different input methods. User input on a standard mobile touch-screen device or a purpose-built touch-sensitive wearable is analyzed in real time, and used to control intensity, location, and motion parameters of the vibrotactile output to synthesize the stroke on a second users arm. Our method demonstrates that different input methods can be used for generating similar vibrotactile sensations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.