2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated performance analysis of a solar aided power generation plant in fuel saving operation mode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides geothermal resources, solar thermal energy can also be used for preheating purpose, this kind of renewable preheating power system is termed as Solar Aided Power Generation (SAPG) technology [20]. Previous studies found that this kind of SAPG power system still have thermodynamic and economic advantages over solar alone power plants [21][22][23][24][25][26]. However, due to the intermittent nature of solar resources, a storage system is needed for the SAPG system [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides geothermal resources, solar thermal energy can also be used for preheating purpose, this kind of renewable preheating power system is termed as Solar Aided Power Generation (SAPG) technology [20]. Previous studies found that this kind of SAPG power system still have thermodynamic and economic advantages over solar alone power plants [21][22][23][24][25][26]. However, due to the intermittent nature of solar resources, a storage system is needed for the SAPG system [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most immediate way is to reduce the fossil fuels use, and at the same time increase the proportion of renewable energy. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Many former researchers have conducted studies on the economic performance analysis or thermodynamic/exergy evaluation of a SAPG system. 3,4 Then the new technology, the synergetic power generation of traditional fossil fuel and renewable energy, emerges as the time require, and provides the possibility for the renewable energy utilization at low cost, high efficiency, and wild scope through the equipment sharing, and the good opportunity for the flexible operation by alternating between different energy resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these potential technical routes, the solar-aided coal-fired power generation (SAPG) has been proved to be a feasible and efficient hybridization way, from both the technical and economic aspects, and has been attracting more and more attentions in recent years. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Many former researchers have conducted studies on the economic performance analysis or thermodynamic/exergy evaluation of a SAPG system. Hu et al 2,11 reported the energy advantages and exergy advantages of a SAPG system based on a typical 500 MWe brown coal-fired power generation unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al established a 330 MW SAPG model and analyzed the dynamic performance of the unit and the dynamic response of the main parameters under typical weather conditions. When the heat output of the solar field reached 2.13 × 10 8 kJ/h, the coal saving rate increased by 6.4% . Based on TRNSYS software, Duan et al established a tower solar collector‐aided coal‐fired power generation system model, and the maximum annual solar‐to‐electricity efficiency was 16.74%, the levelized cost of electricity (LOCE) of the solar‐aided coal‐fired power plant is reduced from 301.5 g/kWh to 294.5 g/kWh compared with coal‐fired power plant …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the heat output of the solar field reached 2.13 × 10 8 kJ/h, the coal saving rate increased by 6.4%. 22 Based on TRNSYS software, Duan et al established a tower solar collector-aided coal-fired power generation system model, and the maximum annual solar-to-electricity efficiency was 16.74%, the levelized cost of electricity (LOCE) of the solar-aided coal-fired power plant is reduced from 301.5 g/kWh to 294.5 g/kWh compared with coal-fired power plant. 23 However, there are more difficulties in the operation of the hybrid system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%