2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2018.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated nutrient and plankton dynamics in the Great Barrier Reef (2011–2016)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biogeochemical model outputs have been compared to a range of in situ observations including 24 water quality moorings, 2 nutrient sampling programmes (with a total of 18 stations) and time-series of taxon-specific plankton abundance (Skerratt et al 2019). As would be expected, the skill of the biogeochemical components was less than that of the physical properties.…”
Section: Calibration Assimilation and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biogeochemical model outputs have been compared to a range of in situ observations including 24 water quality moorings, 2 nutrient sampling programmes (with a total of 18 stations) and time-series of taxon-specific plankton abundance (Skerratt et al 2019). As would be expected, the skill of the biogeochemical components was less than that of the physical properties.…”
Section: Calibration Assimilation and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity to identify taxa to species is especially important for resolving biological diversity around Australia's, see for example phytoplankton provinces (Figure 1). We have recently completed a major revision of the dinoflagellate genus Tripos in Australian waters using data from the NRS, under the guidance of Professor Gustaaf (Skerratt et al, 2019). (B) Zooplankton total grazing (mg C/m3/day) output from the eReefs model (Skerratt et al, 2019).…”
Section: Partnering With Taxonomic Expertsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the relatively rare instances where zooplankton were assessed in biogeochemical models, they were more poorly simulated than almost any other state variable. Gridded products are commonly used in model assessment, from SST to chlorophyll a; we have developed the first gridded products for zooplankton biomass such as that used for assessment of the eReefs biogeochemical model on the Great Barrier Reef (Skerratt et al, 2019) (Figure 8). Given that many significant management issues are tackled by biogeochemical and ecosystem models -including impacts of sediment dumping from dredging, potential management strategies for managing crown-of-thorns, assessing trade-offs of multiple-use of common fisheries resources and coastal aquaculture, and socio-economic impacts of different management decisions -products for model assessment based on plankton data can directly improve our marine management.…”
Section: Product Development To Extend Uptake and Improve Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent assessment of the biogeochemical model (vB2p0) compared simulations against a range of in situ observations that included 24 water quality moorings, 2 nutrient sampling programs (with a total of 18 stations) and time-series of taxonspecific plankton abundance. In addition to providing a range of skill metrics, the assessment included analysis of seasonal plankton dynamics (Skerratt et al, 2019).…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques and observations used in Skerratt et al (2019) have been compared to the version described in this paper (vB3p0) (see Supplementary Material). This includes observations of Chl a, dissolved inorganic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and ammonia, dissolved organic nitrogen and phosphorus, alkalinity, pH, aragonite saturation, mass of suspended sediments and turbidity and Secchi depth.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%