2009
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.1.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated Aftershock Sequences for an M 7.8 Earthquake on the Southern San Andreas Fault

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2-year period was chosen to match the recovery horizon of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) San Francisco Bay Area Catastrophic Earthquake Plan, under development at the same time as the HayWired scenario. The method used to generate earthquake sequences is the same as was used to simulate the 1-week aftershock sequence for the ShakeOut scenario in southern California (Felzer, 2008).…”
Section: Aftershock Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2-year period was chosen to match the recovery horizon of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) San Francisco Bay Area Catastrophic Earthquake Plan, under development at the same time as the HayWired scenario. The method used to generate earthquake sequences is the same as was used to simulate the 1-week aftershock sequence for the ShakeOut scenario in southern California (Felzer, 2008).…”
Section: Aftershock Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We attempt our study with the analysis of seismic b-values in space-time domains. Seismic b-value has been used in a variety of seismological studies, including earthquake forecasting, prediction, and seismic hazard analysis (Kagan and Knopoff, 1987;Rydelek and Sacks, 1989;Geller, 1997;Wiemer and Wyss, 2000;Beauval and Scotti, 2004;Woessner and Wiemer, 2005;Ogata and Zhuang 2006;Khan and Chakraborty, 2007;Felzer, 2008;Khan et al, 2011;Sobolev, 2011;Cheng and Sun, 2018;Peresan and Gentili, 2018). Special emphasis was given to simulate the distribution and the confinement of seismicity around the Delhi- NCR, the adjoining Himalayas, in general, and for three main tectonic domains of interest, i.e., Delhi (Zone X), Kangra (Zone Y) and Uttarkashi (Zone Z) regions, in particular ( Figure 1B).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both parameters have been used in a variety of seismological studies, especially in seismicity simulation (Ogata and Zhuang 2006;Felzer, 2008), earthquake prediction (Kagan and Knopoff, 1987;Geller, 1997), and seismic hazard and risk assessment (Cornell, 1968;Beauval and Scotti, 2004). The accurate calculation of this parameter is therefore of critical importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%