2018
DOI: 10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplifying Sensemaking: Concept, Process, Strengths, Shortcomings, and Ways Forward for Information Systems in Contemporary Business Environments

Abstract: Sensemaking is a popular and useful organizational behaviour concept that is gaining visibility in the field of information systems. However, it remains relatively unknown compared to more established information systems concepts like technology acceptance and resistance. To enhance and propel greater use of sensemaking in information systems, this article offers a systematic explanation of sensemaking, specifically focusing on its concept, process, strengths, and shortcomings, as well as discussing ways forwa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, knowledge about sensemaking enables organizations to mitigate and act when faced with a crisis (Weick et al, 2005). It provides stakeholders with a structured process of dealing with uncertainty (Weick, 1995) and explains mental reality models (Namvar et al, 2018), contributing to informed decision-making. On that note, traditional sensemaking models have been criticized for not fully considering the role of emotions in individuals and organizations (Maitlis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Making Sensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, knowledge about sensemaking enables organizations to mitigate and act when faced with a crisis (Weick et al, 2005). It provides stakeholders with a structured process of dealing with uncertainty (Weick, 1995) and explains mental reality models (Namvar et al, 2018), contributing to informed decision-making. On that note, traditional sensemaking models have been criticized for not fully considering the role of emotions in individuals and organizations (Maitlis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Making Sensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes can be help, hindrances, functions, dysfunctions, consequences, impacts, effects and future horizon which may be applied by a person to any interpretive encounter. Namvar et al (2018) motivate the researchers using sense-making in SM because the theory provides more elaborate thoughts predicated on empirical research to respond to questions.…”
Section: Individual and Organisational Sense-making Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, IS scholars must be aware of the different forms that critical reviews may assume, such as research articles and post-published reviews, and develop their critical reviews accordingly. For example, critical reviews submitted as research articles should deal with topical issues in a specific area in the IS discipline (e.g., Gupta et al, 2018;Lim, 2018;Namvar et al, 2018;Samhan, 2018), whereas critical reviews submitted as post-published reviews should deal with topical issues arising from a recent publication in the journal (e.g., Burmeister, 2020;Koh & Kwok, 2018;Poulsen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Australasian Journal Of Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%