2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplifying computational workflows with the Multiscale Atomic Zeolite Simulation Environment (MAZE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These motifs are labeled according to the valence state and site geometry: Cr 2+ for divalent chromium, Cr 3+ for trivalent chromium, Cr 6+ O for hexavalent chromium with one CrO double bond, and Cr 6+ OO for tetrahedral hexavalent chromium with two CrO double bonds. Taking all 12 unique T-sites in the MFI framework and the possible variations of the same chromium site motif on a single T-site into account, a comprehensive library of chromium structures was generated using the MAZE package . Note that this approach inherently assumes that all of the chromium atoms occupy identical sites in the framework; accounting for the contributions from possible site heterogeneities is beyond the scope of this analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These motifs are labeled according to the valence state and site geometry: Cr 2+ for divalent chromium, Cr 3+ for trivalent chromium, Cr 6+ O for hexavalent chromium with one CrO double bond, and Cr 6+ OO for tetrahedral hexavalent chromium with two CrO double bonds. Taking all 12 unique T-sites in the MFI framework and the possible variations of the same chromium site motif on a single T-site into account, a comprehensive library of chromium structures was generated using the MAZE package . Note that this approach inherently assumes that all of the chromium atoms occupy identical sites in the framework; accounting for the contributions from possible site heterogeneities is beyond the scope of this analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method begins by creating an exhaustive database of DFT-optimized structures that can be used to model the experimental EXAFS. , While uniform atomically dispersed catalysts are more amenable to analysis by QuantEXAFS, this approach has been extended to more complex systems such as Pt/ZSM-5 . The latter study is particularly interesting due to the complexity of the zeolite support; the authors use a zeolite-specific simulation codebase to enumerate all possible bonding sites of Pt 2+ and [Pt–OH] 1+ species in the MFI topology. Although questions about the uniformity of the proposed Pt 2+ site remain open, a key advantage of QuantEXAFS is the ability to compare the modeled EXAFS spectra of different types of sites (e.g., all possible Pt 2+ vs all possible [PtOH] 1+ ) rather than only considering a few plausible configurations.…”
Section: How Is Exafs Being Currently Used By the Catalysis Science C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…98,99 While uniform atomically dispersed catalysts are more amenable by QuantEXAFS, this approach has been extended to more complex systems such as Pt/ZSM-5. 101 The latter study is particularly interesting due to the complexity of the zeolite support; the authors use a zeolite-specific simulation codebase 102 to enumerate all possible bonding sites of Pt 2+ and [Pt-OH] 1+ species in the MFI topology. Although questions about the uniformity of the proposed Pt 2+ site remain open, a key advantage of QuantEXAFS is the ability to compare the modeled EXAFS spectra of different types of sites (e.g., all possible Pt 2+ vs. all possible…”
Section: Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%