2020
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_2111_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplifying and understanding various topographic indices for keratoconus using Scheimpflug based topographers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The progression value at each meridian from the thinnest point is defined as progression index and the average of all meridians is illustrated by Prog-Avg [ 30 32 ]. Doctor and colleagues [ 33 ] reported the clinical significance of a rapid rate of pachymetric progression in distinguishing keratoconus from normal eyes. Other studies [ 20 , 22 , 30 ] have also reported excellent predictive accuracy in using pachymetric progression indices to discriminate keratoconus from normal eyes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The progression value at each meridian from the thinnest point is defined as progression index and the average of all meridians is illustrated by Prog-Avg [ 30 32 ]. Doctor and colleagues [ 33 ] reported the clinical significance of a rapid rate of pachymetric progression in distinguishing keratoconus from normal eyes. Other studies [ 20 , 22 , 30 ] have also reported excellent predictive accuracy in using pachymetric progression indices to discriminate keratoconus from normal eyes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambrosió relational thickness (ART) is the ratio between the thinnest point and progression index. It includes ART max, ART min, and ART avg [ 33 ]. Several studies [ 15 , 18 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 30 ] have reported ART max as a valid diagnostic index in discriminating keratoconic eyes from normal eyes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to a study from the Department of Opthalmology at the Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne 5 , the difficulty of diagnosis may also be compounded by weaker than expected levels of keratoconus expertise among general ophthalmologists. Some corneal topography devices already calculate an index like the CASIA2 Ectasia Severity Index (ESI) 6 or the Pentacam Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display (BAD) 7 , on how deformed a cornea is. Some assumptions underlying those indexes, like the separation of the cornea in < 3 mm and > 3 mm zones in the BAD or the focus on asymmetry in the ESI (thus neglecting central keratoconus cases), seem arbitrary to the authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently available diagnostic algorithms and classification systems are mainly based on unilateral data [ 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Since there is wide variation in the normal population that define their reference ranges, they have shown suboptimal performance in discriminating normal corneas from subclinical forms of disorders [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%