2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified weak Galerkin and new finite difference schemes for the Stokes equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 8. 23 shows that the convergence rate for ∇ d e b 0 is of order O(h 1.9 ) which outperforms the result O(h 1.5 ) in Theorem 7.4. Table 8.23 Test Case 8 : Convergence of the lowest order WG-FEM on the unit cubic domain with exact solution u = sin(x) sin(y) sin(z), non-uniform cubic partitions, stabilization parameter ρ = 1, h = max(|ex|, |ey|, |ez|), and L 2 projection of the Dirichlet boundary data g. The coefficient matrix is a 11 = 1 + x 2 , a 12 = xy/4, a 13 = xz/4, a 22 = 1 + y 2 , a 23 = yz/4, and a 33 = 1 + z 2 .…”
Section: Numerical Experiments For Piecewise Constant Diffusion Tensomentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Table 8. 23 shows that the convergence rate for ∇ d e b 0 is of order O(h 1.9 ) which outperforms the result O(h 1.5 ) in Theorem 7.4. Table 8.23 Test Case 8 : Convergence of the lowest order WG-FEM on the unit cubic domain with exact solution u = sin(x) sin(y) sin(z), non-uniform cubic partitions, stabilization parameter ρ = 1, h = max(|ex|, |ey|, |ez|), and L 2 projection of the Dirichlet boundary data g. The coefficient matrix is a 11 = 1 + x 2 , a 12 = xy/4, a 13 = xz/4, a 22 = 1 + y 2 , a 23 = yz/4, and a 33 = 1 + z 2 .…”
Section: Numerical Experiments For Piecewise Constant Diffusion Tensomentioning
confidence: 67%
“…According to (24), (52), the random initial condition (20), and the regularity condition of f, we complete the proof.…”
Section: Semidiscrete Error Analysis For Simplicity We Introduce Twmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…en, the WG method is successfully applied to elliptic interface problems [11,12] and linear parabolic problems [13][14][15][16] and further developed for other applications, such as biharmonic problems [17][18][19][20][21][22], Cahn-Hilliard problems [23], and Stokes problems [24][25][26][27][28][29]. To ensure the method is highly flexible in element construction and mesh generation, the idea of a stabilization term is introduced in [30], which allows for arbitrary piecewise polynomial shape functions in deformed and honeycomb meshes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, svb can be viewed as an extension of v b from ∂T to T through a least‐squares fitting, and its computation is local and well‐defined. Readers are referred to for a detailed derivation.…”
Section: Swg On Polymeshmentioning
confidence: 99%