1995
DOI: 10.2514/3.46705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified tunnel correction method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aerodynamic coefficients were corrected using the boundary correction method. 22) Output data from the balance system was acquired at a sampling frequency of 100 Hz, with 500 individual data points for each output.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerodynamic coefficients were corrected using the boundary correction method. 22) Output data from the balance system was acquired at a sampling frequency of 100 Hz, with 500 individual data points for each output.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closed test section wake-and solidblockage corrections were estimated using a simplified correlation by Shindo [38] for the moderate AR wings (AR > 2). At the highest angle of attack for the largest AR test plate, the corrections for C L and C D were approximately 2.6%.…”
Section: B Aerodynamic Loads Acquisition Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitching moments were nondimensionalized using the mean aerodynamic chord c (2c r =3) and taken about a moment reference center at the quarter-chord point (0:5c r ). Solid and wake blockage were corrected for using the method of [24], with downwash corrections from [25]. Balance accuracy was estimated at better than 0.15% in lift, drag, and pitching moment, with pitch angle set to better than 0.1 .…”
Section: Experimental Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%