2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified spring models for concrete segmental lining longitudinal joints with gaskets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the influence of the gasket holes opening rate on the sealing gasket waterproofing, based on the previous research conclusions, 4,5,6,8,10,12,14,21,22 the gasket model in this section will adopt the ''Sheffield'' section with double-row circular staggered holes. The influence of the area change of closed holes portion (orange), open holes circular portion (blue), and open holes trapeziform portion (green) on the waterproof performance of the sealing gasket was studied with the opening rate as the control variable.…”
Section: Influence Of Opening Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the influence of the gasket holes opening rate on the sealing gasket waterproofing, based on the previous research conclusions, 4,5,6,8,10,12,14,21,22 the gasket model in this section will adopt the ''Sheffield'' section with double-row circular staggered holes. The influence of the area change of closed holes portion (orange), open holes circular portion (blue), and open holes trapeziform portion (green) on the waterproof performance of the sealing gasket was studied with the opening rate as the control variable.…”
Section: Influence Of Opening Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water leakage is all along one of the potential problems of underground structures. [3][4][5][6] It has become a topical issue for segmental joints of shield tunnels during the construction and the operation stages. However, characteristic parameters of sealing gasket in shield tunnels have been seldom obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take account of the EG, as presented in Figure 2b, the existing analytical approaches for the joint with EG are mainly based on the assumption that the concrete is much more rigid than EG, and the deformations of EG are much greater than those of the concrete. Therefore, only the compressive strains of EG are taken into consideration, while the compressive strains of the concrete attached to the EG are neglected [19][20][21][22][23][24]. In sum, this assumption only considers the stress generated by the compression of the EG instead of the concrete-EG-concrete composite structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to the constitutive model of EG, the rigidity of EG tends to be increased rapidly with increasing the compressive stress, and the EG can no longer be considered as a flexible material in this condition [16,25,26]. This leads to the result that, when the joints are subjected to large loads, the joint rotational stiffnesses calculated by the analytical approaches cannot coincide well with the numerical results [22][23][24]. Therefore, the deformations of the EG and the attached concrete should be both taken into consideration in the analytical approach to calculate the joint rotational stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerical simulations 14 and experimental results 15 reveal that the segmental lining behavior is particularly dependent on the rotational stiffness. Therefore, the longitudinal joint rotational stiffness was investigated based on laboratory tests, 16,17 numerical simulations 18,19 and analytical models 1,20,21 . Because of the complex details of the segmental joints and the material nonlinearity, the joint rotation stiffness behaves nonlinearly with increasing internal forces 5,22,23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%