1975
DOI: 10.1016/0042-207x(75)91860-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified methods for the calculation of partial pressure using the relative ionization cross-section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plot is simply the ratio of the integrated ion currents ([ethylene/(ethylene + ethanol)] and [propylene/(propylene + 2-propanol)]) without correcting for their respective calibration factors. In fact, the ratios of the relative ionization probabilities for the alcohols to those of their corresponding alkenes are both approximately 1.5. Therefore, correcting the area ratios will not qualitatively change the plot. As shown in Figure , the yields of ethylene and propylene were strongly coverage dependent, but were not significantly different for the oxidized vs the reduced WO 3 (001) surfaces, demonstrating the insensitivity of the dehydration of alcohols to the surface structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plot is simply the ratio of the integrated ion currents ([ethylene/(ethylene + ethanol)] and [propylene/(propylene + 2-propanol)]) without correcting for their respective calibration factors. In fact, the ratios of the relative ionization probabilities for the alcohols to those of their corresponding alkenes are both approximately 1.5. Therefore, correcting the area ratios will not qualitatively change the plot. As shown in Figure , the yields of ethylene and propylene were strongly coverage dependent, but were not significantly different for the oxidized vs the reduced WO 3 (001) surfaces, demonstrating the insensitivity of the dehydration of alcohols to the surface structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams' group has reported reaction rate constants of proton transfer from [M i + zH] z+ and [M r + zH] z+ to gaseous molecules by means of FT-ICR. 61 Because PA of dipropylamine is almost equivalent to that of Dmpy, 74 the present results of the rate constants with Dmpy can be compared with their results for the reaction with dipropylamine. For [M r + 10H] 10+ , the present values were almost the same as their results.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Detection efficiency for Dmpy with ionization vacuum gauge is assumed to be equal to that for n -heptane. This value is 7.6 compared with that of N 2 . Conductance of the gas cell and the third vacuum chamber was estimated by considering the evacuation rate of the diffusion pump and diameter of entrance and exit hole of the gas cell. It is confirmed that the pressure in the gas cell is 172 ± 5 times higher than that in the third vacuum chamber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%