2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified frame model for capacity assessment of masonry buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vertical separation cracks and corner failures that trigger short wall collapse are the main failure modes in PRE-SMM buildings, as confirmed by observed damage and the results of numerical analyses (Adhikari and D'Ayala, 2020). Shrestha et al (2020) proposed a generalized analysis scheme, and a simplified frame model and results from SFM show strong agreement with the experimental result for base shear and approximately 5% error in the case of ultimate drift. The simplified model can be used in the performance-based design of masonry buildings and for the assessment of existing masonry buildings and for low-rise masonry buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Vertical separation cracks and corner failures that trigger short wall collapse are the main failure modes in PRE-SMM buildings, as confirmed by observed damage and the results of numerical analyses (Adhikari and D'Ayala, 2020). Shrestha et al (2020) proposed a generalized analysis scheme, and a simplified frame model and results from SFM show strong agreement with the experimental result for base shear and approximately 5% error in the case of ultimate drift. The simplified model can be used in the performance-based design of masonry buildings and for the assessment of existing masonry buildings and for low-rise masonry buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Notably, Augenti et al [21] have congregated online experimental data to facilitate numerical modeling of masonry structures. In the case of unavailability of the testing facility, many researchers have considered computational approaches to depict the behavior of masonry walls and structures (e.g., [22][23][24], among others). More focus on masonry research converges toward mechanical characterization of bonding behavior, cohesion, and friction between masonry constituents (e.g., [25,26]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Vanin et al, 2020) The equivalent beam-based model, also referred to as the equivalent frame model, represents the piers and spandrels of the structure using frame components connected by rigid nodes. (Shrestha et al, 2020) The nonlinear mechanical properties are represented by nonlinear springs defined in the frame components, based on the possible in-plane failure mechanisms for the masonry; rocking, diagonal cracking, or shear sliding. (Shrestha et al, 2020) The spring-based modelling approach represents the masonry with rigid frame components connected by nonlinear springs.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Shrestha et al, 2020) The nonlinear mechanical properties are represented by nonlinear springs defined in the frame components, based on the possible in-plane failure mechanisms for the masonry; rocking, diagonal cracking, or shear sliding. (Shrestha et al, 2020) The spring-based modelling approach represents the masonry with rigid frame components connected by nonlinear springs. (D'Altri et al, 2020) The rigid frame components capture the geometry of the structure, while the mechanical properties of the material are presented by the properties defined for the springs.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%