BACKGROUND: Exercise testing is recommended before prescribing individualized exercise intensity. However, there are few data demonstrating how exercise test responses are translated into individualized training intensity using a simple method. We previously developed a simple method to rate dyspnea called the count scale, including the count scale number (CSN) and count scale time. The purpose of this study was to assess the CSN for translation of exercise test response to training intensity. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects (22 men and 6 women) with COPD age 66.6 ؎ 8.22 y participated in 2 exercise sessions. During the first session, in which exercise was guided by the heart rate, the CSN and heart rate were obtained (ie, CSN 1 and HR 1 ) while the heart rate was increased by 20% compared with the resting heart rate. During the second session, exercise was guided by the CSN. When the CSN was close to the CSN 1 , the CSN and corresponding heart rate were recorded as CSN 2 and HR 2 . Differences between CSN 1 and CSN 2 and between HR 1 and HR 2 were compared. The relationship between HR 1 and HR 2 was analyzed. Agreement between HR 1 and HR 2 was evaluated by Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between HR 1 and HR 2 (96 ؎ 11 and 97 ؎ 11, respectively; P ؍ .14). A high correlation between HR 1 and HR 2 was found (r ؍ 0.932, P < .001). The 95% CI for the difference between HR 1 and HR 2 was ؊1.2 to 8.5 beats/min. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise guided by the CSN alone could result in a given heart rate response, suggesting that the CSN is a simple and practical tool in translating exercise test results into individualized training intensity. With the CSN as the intensity indicator, patients can exercise safely and effectively.