2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified design and capacity calculations of shear strength in reinforced concrete membrane elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the overall comparison including the bulk of the experimental data, the proposed verification method has an average error which is closer to 1, the lowest coefficient of variation, a 5% percentile similar to all the other simplified methods, and greater accuracy in regions B (T-Y) and C (T-T). Moreover, the modes of failure registered in the experimental tests and the modes of failure predicted by the simplified method proposed in this paper, and also with the simplified methods by Kaufmann and Marti (1998) [11], Carbone, Giordano and Mancini (2001) [4], and Rahal (2008) [16] are compared in Table 3. The accuracy achieved with the proposed method is 87%, while with Kaufmann and Marti (1998) [11] is 84%, with Carbone, Giordano and Mancini (2001) [4] is 84% and with Rahal (2008) [16] is 90%.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Simplified Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the overall comparison including the bulk of the experimental data, the proposed verification method has an average error which is closer to 1, the lowest coefficient of variation, a 5% percentile similar to all the other simplified methods, and greater accuracy in regions B (T-Y) and C (T-T). Moreover, the modes of failure registered in the experimental tests and the modes of failure predicted by the simplified method proposed in this paper, and also with the simplified methods by Kaufmann and Marti (1998) [11], Carbone, Giordano and Mancini (2001) [4], and Rahal (2008) [16] are compared in Table 3. The accuracy achieved with the proposed method is 87%, while with Kaufmann and Marti (1998) [11] is 84%, with Carbone, Giordano and Mancini (2001) [4] is 84% and with Rahal (2008) [16] is 90%.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Simplified Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the results in the literature for the 88 specimens (Table 1) with the proposed verification method have also been compared with the following simplified methods proposed by Kaufmann and Marti (1998) [11], Carbone, Giordano and Mancini (2001) [4], and Rahal (2008) [16]. Table 5 [8].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Simplified Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations