2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.205311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified density-matrix model applied to three-well terahertz quantum cascade lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
122
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
122
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, simulations have been performed for a large variety of samples with different models. These can be based on rate equations for the electron densities, 3,4 Monte-Carlo simulations of the Boltzmann equation for the occupations of the k-states in the individual subbands, [5][6][7][8] density matrix calculations, [9][10][11][12][13] which have been also done k-resolved, 7,14,15 as well as nonequilibrium Green's functions (NEGF). [16][17][18][19][20] While the published results from either scheme typically agree well with experimental data, it is not clear how the choices of parameters (in particular, interface roughness (IFR) distributions and band offsets), specific approximations (such as screening models or various model-specific assumptions as subband temperatures), or model complexity affect the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, simulations have been performed for a large variety of samples with different models. These can be based on rate equations for the electron densities, 3,4 Monte-Carlo simulations of the Boltzmann equation for the occupations of the k-states in the individual subbands, [5][6][7][8] density matrix calculations, [9][10][11][12][13] which have been also done k-resolved, 7,14,15 as well as nonequilibrium Green's functions (NEGF). [16][17][18][19][20] While the published results from either scheme typically agree well with experimental data, it is not clear how the choices of parameters (in particular, interface roughness (IFR) distributions and band offsets), specific approximations (such as screening models or various model-specific assumptions as subband temperatures), or model complexity affect the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with the fact that the optimization parameters are typically trade-offs for one another, the task is very complex. Here, typically simpler rate equation or density matrix models are used in order to more quickly sweep the parameter space [21][22][23] , while more advanced models, such as non-equilibrium Green's functions (NEGF) or Monte-Carlo, are used to validate and analyze the final designs 13,[24][25][26] . In contrast, in this work we will employ an advanced model directly at the optimization stage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pulse is made as strong as possible in order to get a good signal to noise ratio but it is not known how the system dynamics are affected by such a measurement. The simulation of THz QCLs relies on a consistent treatment of tunneling and scattering, either by hybrid density matrix/rate equation schemes [9][10][11][12][13] or more evolved nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) theory. [14][15][16][17] Here, we present an extension of our NEGF scheme 18 towards the treatment of high intensities inside the QCL, going beyond linear response to an external electromagnetic field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%