2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified assessment of pile-head kinematic demand in layered soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study extend, therefore, the validity of the simple analytical solutions to the non-linear range of soil response, denoting that kinematic soil-pile interaction is controlled by the soil stiffness even if the response of the soil is controlled by its strength. The above finding generalizes earlier indications [27][28][29][30] of the controlling role of the mobilized soil stiffness on pile kinematic bending.…”
Section: Frequency Effects: Proposed Analytical Expressionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results of this study extend, therefore, the validity of the simple analytical solutions to the non-linear range of soil response, denoting that kinematic soil-pile interaction is controlled by the soil stiffness even if the response of the soil is controlled by its strength. The above finding generalizes earlier indications [27][28][29][30] of the controlling role of the mobilized soil stiffness on pile kinematic bending.…”
Section: Frequency Effects: Proposed Analytical Expressionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The nonlinearity of the unsaturated soil is neglected, and thus a linearly elastic soil constitution is adopted for mathematical convenience in this study. Literature research from Stacul et al 30 and Mucciacciaro and Sica 31 shows that some deviations in comparisons with the calculated results utilizing nonlinear soil constitution will occur. However, the motivation of the proposed solution is to simulate the Rayleigh wave propagation across the unsaturated soil-pile system and elastic soil constitution is sufficient enough.…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There are two main simplifications and explanations are listed adopted in this paper as follows: The nonlinearity of the unsaturated soil is neglected, and thus a linearly elastic soil constitution is adopted for mathematical convenience in this study. Literature research from Stacul et al 30 . and Mucciacciaro and Sica 31 shows that some deviations in comparisons with the calculated results utilizing nonlinear soil constitution will occur.…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The methods described in the literature to account for kinematic interaction effects in the seismic analysis of piles are broadly classified into numerical and analytical. Numerical methods such as the Finite Element Method [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and the Boundary Element Method [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] have been widely used to study the response of piles affected by seismic waves, but are seldom used in engineering practice as the cost associated with performing three dimensional dynamic simulations is often prohibitive. A much more efficient alternative to modelling the pile and its surrounding soil as continua is the Beam-on-Dynamic-Winkler-Foundation (BDWF) concept, in which soil resistance to pile deformations is modelled by means of distributed and independent springs and dashpots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%