The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2001
DOI: 10.1177/109114210102900103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplification and Decentralization of the Income Tax

Abstract: This article presents a new type of welfare-improving tax reform model aimed at simultaneously achieving simplification and decentralization of the personal income tax. This model is based on the results of Pfähler and Dardanoni and Lambert and comprises two elements. The first one is the transformation of the income tax into an equal-yield flat tax. The second one is a reduction of the central taxation in proportion to posttax income in order to vacate a space that may be utilized by subcentral jurisdictions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. In Badenes et al (2001), we also designed a model for the decentralization (and simplification) of a personal income tax (PIT) but within a different welfare framework.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. In Badenes et al (2001), we also designed a model for the decentralization (and simplification) of a personal income tax (PIT) but within a different welfare framework.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From amongst the most recent contributions, those of Wellisch (2000) can be recommended. 2 Regarding the use of equivalence scales and their normative foundations, it is useful to consultEbert (1997Ebert ( , 1999Ebert ( , 2000 and Moyes (2000, 2003).3 InBadenes et al (2001) we also designed a model for the decentralization (and simplification) of PIT, but within a different welfare framework.4 In our opinion, this conclusion is highly debatable. If the legislator introduces a differential treatment in PIT between individuals, this is because he or she considers that, even having the same income, the individuals belonging to a particular group have greater needs and, as a result, a lower ability to pay than the individuals belonging to the other group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%