Abstract:This article presents a new type of welfare-improving tax reform model aimed at simultaneously achieving simplification and decentralization of the personal income tax. This model is based on the results of Pfähler and Dardanoni and Lambert and comprises two elements. The first one is the transformation of the income tax into an equal-yield flat tax. The second one is a reduction of the central taxation in proportion to posttax income in order to vacate a space that may be utilized by subcentral jurisdictions … Show more
“…3. In Badenes et al (2001), we also designed a model for the decentralization (and simplification) of a personal income tax (PIT) but within a different welfare framework.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From amongst the most recent contributions, those of Wellisch (2000) can be recommended. 2 Regarding the use of equivalence scales and their normative foundations, it is useful to consultEbert (1997Ebert ( , 1999Ebert ( , 2000 and Moyes (2000, 2003).3 InBadenes et al (2001) we also designed a model for the decentralization (and simplification) of PIT, but within a different welfare framework.4 In our opinion, this conclusion is highly debatable. If the legislator introduces a differential treatment in PIT between individuals, this is because he or she considers that, even having the same income, the individuals belonging to a particular group have greater needs and, as a result, a lower ability to pay than the individuals belonging to the other group.…”
This paper elaborates and evaluates a model for the decentralization of personal income tax which is consistent with the optimal redistribution model proposed by Tresch (2002), within a framework of social welfare à la Atkinson and Bourguignon (1987). In our model, the regions have individualistic, symmetrical, additively separable and inequality-averse social welfare functions. Each region applies to its constituents a progressive Personal Income Tax (PIT), which measures the individuals' ability to pay with sole regard to their income. The central government has a social welfare function à la Atkinson and Bourguignon (1987). Its tax-raising power is limited to the establishment of a surcharge (or deduction) proportional to the income of individuals, net of the respective regional taxes. In accordance with these hypotheses, this paper presents the conditions which permit this model of fiscal decentralization to be recommended, from the point of view of the reduction of inequality and the increase in welfare, in each region and in the country as a whole. The theoretical results are applied to the Spanish IRPF (Impuesto sobre la Renta de las Personas Físicas), by the performance of various microsimulation exercises.
“…3. In Badenes et al (2001), we also designed a model for the decentralization (and simplification) of a personal income tax (PIT) but within a different welfare framework.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From amongst the most recent contributions, those of Wellisch (2000) can be recommended. 2 Regarding the use of equivalence scales and their normative foundations, it is useful to consultEbert (1997Ebert ( , 1999Ebert ( , 2000 and Moyes (2000, 2003).3 InBadenes et al (2001) we also designed a model for the decentralization (and simplification) of PIT, but within a different welfare framework.4 In our opinion, this conclusion is highly debatable. If the legislator introduces a differential treatment in PIT between individuals, this is because he or she considers that, even having the same income, the individuals belonging to a particular group have greater needs and, as a result, a lower ability to pay than the individuals belonging to the other group.…”
This paper elaborates and evaluates a model for the decentralization of personal income tax which is consistent with the optimal redistribution model proposed by Tresch (2002), within a framework of social welfare à la Atkinson and Bourguignon (1987). In our model, the regions have individualistic, symmetrical, additively separable and inequality-averse social welfare functions. Each region applies to its constituents a progressive Personal Income Tax (PIT), which measures the individuals' ability to pay with sole regard to their income. The central government has a social welfare function à la Atkinson and Bourguignon (1987). Its tax-raising power is limited to the establishment of a surcharge (or deduction) proportional to the income of individuals, net of the respective regional taxes. In accordance with these hypotheses, this paper presents the conditions which permit this model of fiscal decentralization to be recommended, from the point of view of the reduction of inequality and the increase in welfare, in each region and in the country as a whole. The theoretical results are applied to the Spanish IRPF (Impuesto sobre la Renta de las Personas Físicas), by the performance of various microsimulation exercises.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.