2010
DOI: 10.1029/2010wr009160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplicity and complexity of bed load response during flash floods in a gravel bed ephemeral river: A 10 year field study

Abstract: [1] A decade of data for the Nahal Eshtemoa, an unarmored, gravel bed, ephemeral river, reveals that bed load flux during rain-fed flash floods is a simple function of channel average boundary shear stress. However, the relation is inadequately described by a power function of the type commonly used in predictive bed load equations, and a linear function gives a much better fit. The success of a linear function is related to the unarmored nature of the bed material, typical of ephemeral gravel bed rivers, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 2008–2009 dataset, maximum channel‐average bedload flux was 0.35 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (a non‐dimensional bedload flux i b * = 0.02) and this was produced at a channel‐average shear stress of 25.3 N m ‐2 (τ * = 0.100). In the 1991–2001 database at the same level of shear stress (Cohen et al ., , Figure ), bedload flux is 3.6 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (i b * = 0.17) at the left‐hand edge of the data envelope and 2.2 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (i b * = 0.1) according to the linear least‐squares relation, 10.3 and 6.3 times the maximum 2008–2009 value, respectively. Moreover, during 2008–2009, the highest channel average shear stress (28 N m ‐2 , τ * = 0.110) generated bedload fluxes no larger than 0.3 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (i b * = 0.01), whereas during 1991–2001, the same channel average shear stress produced bedload fluxes in the range 1.1 to 4.2 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (i b * = 0.05 to 0.20), 3.5 to 14 times larger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 2008–2009 dataset, maximum channel‐average bedload flux was 0.35 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (a non‐dimensional bedload flux i b * = 0.02) and this was produced at a channel‐average shear stress of 25.3 N m ‐2 (τ * = 0.100). In the 1991–2001 database at the same level of shear stress (Cohen et al ., , Figure ), bedload flux is 3.6 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (i b * = 0.17) at the left‐hand edge of the data envelope and 2.2 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (i b * = 0.1) according to the linear least‐squares relation, 10.3 and 6.3 times the maximum 2008–2009 value, respectively. Moreover, during 2008–2009, the highest channel average shear stress (28 N m ‐2 , τ * = 0.110) generated bedload fluxes no larger than 0.3 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (i b * = 0.01), whereas during 1991–2001, the same channel average shear stress produced bedload fluxes in the range 1.1 to 4.2 kg m ‐1 s ‐1 (i b * = 0.05 to 0.20), 3.5 to 14 times larger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This factor should represent the flow duration curve from the previous high‐magnitude event able to restructure the bed (e.g., mobilizing even the D 84 as fully mobile conditions in the sense of Wilcock and McArdell [1997]). Also, because timings and temporal sequences of flood events can have a strong influence on bed load transport [ Cohen et al , 2010; Recking et al , 2012] this correction factor for bed load transport formulas should also include a term characterizing the temporal sequence of disturbance of different magnitude. The present study reveals that differences between rising and falling limb of hydrographs, mainly due to changes in the degree of grain organization in the mobile armor layer, could be quantified by analyzing simple statistical moments and second‐order structure functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both of these bedform types contribute material to bedload, the majority is derived from the flats and comprises pebbles, granules and sand. Coarser grains, including cobbles and boulders, are mobilized at higher boundary shear stresses and the size-range of the bed material is proportionally represented in the bedload at transport stages ≥ 4.5 τ/τc (Powell et al, 2001;Cohen et al, 2010). This wide range of mobile particle sizes is of particular significance when considering the performance of geophones in this stream environment.…”
Section: Nahal Eshtemoa Field Site and Calibration Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%