1967
DOI: 10.2307/1970440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplicial Structures and Transverse Cellularity

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower ^-groups K-¡(Zii) were first defined by Bass in [1] and later by Ranicki as transfer invariant elements of Wh(7r x Z!+1) (see [21]). The Whitehead group Wh(A') of a CW complex X is defined geometrically in various places (see [6]). A typical element in Wh(A") is an equivalence class of pairs (Y, f), where F is a CW complex and /: Y -* X is a strong deformation retraction.…”
Section: Geometric Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower ^-groups K-¡(Zii) were first defined by Bass in [1] and later by Ranicki as transfer invariant elements of Wh(7r x Z!+1) (see [21]). The Whitehead group Wh(A') of a CW complex X is defined geometrically in various places (see [6]). A typical element in Wh(A") is an equivalence class of pairs (Y, f), where F is a CW complex and /: Y -* X is a strong deformation retraction.…”
Section: Geometric Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as in the finite case, Wh(X) « Wh(nx(X)). This description of Wh(Z) is suitable for carrying over the construction given in [6] for Wh(X)c ; i.e. the definition of Wh(J)c, for an arbitrary CW complex X, is completely analogous with the finite case.…”
Section: Geometric Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(We will say that A is a subcomplex of C, when no confusion can occur.) A subdivision B of C is a cone complex with I B I = I CI such that aE C implies ctyTBCone complexes were introduced by Akin [2], following ideas of Cohen [7]. He also introduced the concept of "structuring" a cone complex to study its geometry.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So suppose height C = «, and the lemma is true for complexes of height < n. Thus we assume 8 I IC"_ xl has been defined, so we just need to define ¡517 for each principal cone 7 of C, given 8137-Let K = (r_©(8|37))'> a triangulation of 7 (depending on the given structure of 7). Let the cones of 817 be the following sets (not the cones of 7 © (81 oy)):…”
Section: Restriction Following Akin [2]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation