2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-006-0193-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple versus complex assessment of white matter hyperintensities in relation to physical performance and cognition: the LADIS study

Abstract: Simple and complex measures of WMH yield comparable associations with measures of physical performance and cognition. This suggests that a simple visual rating scale may be sufficient, when analyzing relationships between clinical parameters and WMH in a clinical setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
84
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present observations suggest that this differential relation of RSS DWMH and PWMH with cognition might be caused by the accuracy of the RSS DWMH scale and does not necessarily indicate that DWMH and PWMH have differential effects on cognition. A number of previous studies have compared different WMH scoring methods, including volumetry, in relation to cognitive function [28,29,30]. In a small study involving 39 patients with vascular dementia, volumetric assessment was superior to visual assessment, but these results cannot directly be applied to patients with a lower lesion load [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present observations suggest that this differential relation of RSS DWMH and PWMH with cognition might be caused by the accuracy of the RSS DWMH scale and does not necessarily indicate that DWMH and PWMH have differential effects on cognition. A number of previous studies have compared different WMH scoring methods, including volumetry, in relation to cognitive function [28,29,30]. In a small study involving 39 patients with vascular dementia, volumetric assessment was superior to visual assessment, but these results cannot directly be applied to patients with a lower lesion load [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WMH volumetry can not be regarded as such, as WMH volumetry is equal to visual scales with respect to associations with clinical measures such as physical performance and cognition [22]. Furthermore, the sample that was used in this study consisted of consecutive Amsterdam participants of the LADIS study that was stratified for WMH grade in order to include a wide range of WMH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separate DWM hyperintensity was graded as 0=absent, 1=punctuate foci, 2=beginning confluence of foci, or 3=large confluent areas. 26 This scale previously has been validated as a reliable measure for degree of LA with good interrater reliability, [27][28][29][30] and has been used extensively to grade severity of LA in stroke and in epidemiological studies. 8,17,29,30 …”
Section: Data Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%