2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5240-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Vascular Architecture Classification in Predicting Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade and Prognosis

Abstract: In the novel simple VA classification, peritumoral, intratumoral, and absent vessels are prone to be G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Combined with serum CA19-9 and lesion size, the VA classification could predict tumor grade and prognosis in PNET.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, mediastinal lymph node metastasis and multiple bone metastasis were detected 1 and 4 years after initial surgery, respectively. The metastatic potential was consistent with elevated CA19‐9 in pancreatic NETs 3,4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our case, mediastinal lymph node metastasis and multiple bone metastasis were detected 1 and 4 years after initial surgery, respectively. The metastatic potential was consistent with elevated CA19‐9 in pancreatic NETs 3,4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Luo et al 3 reported that CA19‐9 > 16 U/ml was significantly associated with a higher proportion of patients at advanced stages and was an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival. Chen et al 4 reported that serum CA19‐9 was elevated in 12.4% (12/112 cases) of pancreatic NETs, and elevated CA19‐9 was an independent predictor of NET G3 tumor, suggesting that CA19‐9 elevation is associated with high‐grade aggressiveness. In medullary thyroid cancer, elevated CA19‐9 was predictive of poor prognosis 8–10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tumor grade represents a gestalt of all subtle changes in molecular level, re ecting proliferation and aggressiveness. [3][4][5][6][7][8] The distribution of tumor grade were different between younger and older patients in some types of tumor. [9][10][11][12] However, previous studies did not illustrate the independent association between age and tumor grade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%