2019
DOI: 10.1512/iumj.2019.68.7554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple transitive 2-representations via (co)algebra 1-morphisms

Abstract: For any fiat 2-category C, we show how its simple transitive 2-representations can be constructed using coalgebra 1-morphisms in the injective abelianization of C . Dually, we show that these can also be constructed using algebra 1-morphisms in the projective abelianization of C. We also extend Morita-Takeuchi theory to our setup and work out several examples, including that of Soergel bimodules for dihedral groups, explicitly.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weak Jordan-Hölder theory developed in [MM5] motivates the study of so-called simple transitive 2-representations which are suitable 2-analogues of simple modules. It turns out that, in many cases, simple transitive 2-representations can be explicitly classified, see [MM5,MM6,MaMa,KMMZ,MMMT,MMZ,MT,MZ1,MZ2,Zh,Zi1,Zi3] for the results and [Maz2] for a detailed survey on the subject. In many, but not all, cases, simple transitive 2-representations are exhausted by so-called cell 2-representations defined already in [MM1].…”
Section: Introduction and Description Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weak Jordan-Hölder theory developed in [MM5] motivates the study of so-called simple transitive 2-representations which are suitable 2-analogues of simple modules. It turns out that, in many cases, simple transitive 2-representations can be explicitly classified, see [MM5,MM6,MaMa,KMMZ,MMMT,MMZ,MT,MZ1,MZ2,Zh,Zi1,Zi3] for the results and [Maz2] for a detailed survey on the subject. In many, but not all, cases, simple transitive 2-representations are exhausted by so-called cell 2-representations defined already in [MM1].…”
Section: Introduction and Description Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from [MMMT,Theorem 22] that the as an object of C R (i, i), the coalgebra 1-morphism C L := [R, R] is isomorphic to F. For C ½ , the corresponding coalgebra 1-morphism C ½ := [k, k] can be calculated via the defining adjunction isomorphisms Hom C R (C ½ , G) ∼ = Hom C ½ (i) (k, Gk) for all indecomposable 1-morphisms G, which yield that it is is isomorphic to the simple socle L ½ of ½ in C R (i, i). In fact, C ½ is a quotient 2-representation of P, so C ½ is a subcoalgebra of C P , which implies that the counit and comultiplication maps defining C ½ are both the identity map on L ½ .…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can (injectively) abelianise both the 2-category C and, for a 2-representation M, the category M := i∈C M(i) and use the notation (−) for the injective abelianisation (2)-functor. For the 2-category, this needs to be done in a rather technical way, see [MMMT,Section 3.2] to preserve strictness of horizontal composition. Note that, provided that C is weakly fiat, composition in C is left exact in both variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To conclude, one could say that Elias' quantum Satake correspondence [Eli16], [Eli17] categorifies the relation between the Verlinde algebra and the small dihedral quotient, while the results from [KMMZ19], [MT16], [MMMT19] categorify the relations between their N-representations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%