15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-2598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Tool for Aircraft Noise-Reduction Route Design

Abstract: The design of arrival and departure routes from an airport has to balance the conflicting requirements of fuel efficiency, airport capacity utilization and community emission and noise considerations. The commonly used tools for aircraft noise assessment are the FAA's Integrated Noise Model (INM) and Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT). These tools are suitable to generate precise noise contours. However, they are harder to use with other tools for route design optimization involving evaluation of a larg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enabling a large number of scenarios to be computed in a short period of time, this statistically based classification and selection of representative-in-class vehicles can therefore be especially useful for multi-objective optimization analysis of aircraft technologies for minimizing environmental impact (Afonso et al, 2017;Jimenez and Mavris, 2017), aircraft route optimization for minimizing aircraft noise and emissions (Li et al, 2015), and economicenvironmental tradeoffs analysis (Rosskopf et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Enabling a large number of scenarios to be computed in a short period of time, this statistically based classification and selection of representative-in-class vehicles can therefore be especially useful for multi-objective optimization analysis of aircraft technologies for minimizing environmental impact (Afonso et al, 2017;Jimenez and Mavris, 2017), aircraft route optimization for minimizing aircraft noise and emissions (Li et al, 2015), and economicenvironmental tradeoffs analysis (Rosskopf et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these high-fidelity airport noise models achieve minimal uncertainty at the expense of a significant computational time, and therefore they are not always practical in preliminary strategic planning and decision making involving several technology options, noise-abatement procedures and/or air traffic strategies. To overcome such requirements of computational time and allow a rapid calculation of airport noise outputs, a number of simplified airport noise models for fleet-level studies have been developed (Dikshit and Crossley, 2009;Bernardo et al, 2015;Li et al, 2015;Torija et al, 2017). These simplified airport noise models assume several simplifications, which decrease the accuracy when computing noise outputs and restrict their application to some specific conditions and/or scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise computation method is based on SAE's standard procedures that are also used in the FAA's software [12][13][14]. Detailed equations and discussions can be found in previous work [15]. The method is implemented in the C programming language.…”
Section: Software Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, most researches take the coverage of noise level as the evaluation indicator, but it cannot directly and accurately reflect the impact of aviation noise on the surrounding residents. This paper refers to the noise exposure population evaluation method proposed by Jinhua Li [13,14], divides the covered area of the terminal area into several grids with an area of S, and takes the center of the grid as the noise measuring point. According to the density distribution of residents, the total population of different noise level was calculated.…”
Section: Noisementioning
confidence: 99%