2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Scheme to Predict Transition-State Energies of Dehydration Reactions in Zeolites with Relevance to Biomass Conversion

Abstract: Dehydration of various alcohols over H-ZSM-5 is studied using density functional theory. The activation energies are shown to scale linearly with the van der Waals interaction with the zeolite framework. The van der Waals interaction itself is shown to be a simple function of the number of atoms of the involved alcohol. Consequently, activation barriers for the dehydration of primary alcohols are now easily derived directly from the number of atoms of these alcohols through the obtained scaling relations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In earlier work employing H-ZSM-5, we identified a difference between MeOH and EtOH of 17, 13, and 18 kJ/mol for the IS, TS and FS, respectively. [19] Similar differences are also observed for the other seven zeotypes as shown in Figure 3, where the transition states of SMS and SES formation are compared. On average SES formation has 20 kJ/mol lower barriers compared to SMS formation, when referenced to the corresponding gas-phase oxygenate, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In earlier work employing H-ZSM-5, we identified a difference between MeOH and EtOH of 17, 13, and 18 kJ/mol for the IS, TS and FS, respectively. [19] Similar differences are also observed for the other seven zeotypes as shown in Figure 3, where the transition states of SMS and SES formation are compared. On average SES formation has 20 kJ/mol lower barriers compared to SMS formation, when referenced to the corresponding gas-phase oxygenate, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In each case, we focus on the reactivity of one specific choice of T-site, where we choose positions that have been investigated previously. [19,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] Similar to the MeOH case, we obtain adsorption energies of EtOH ranging from À 113 kJ/mol (H-SSZ-24 and H-BEA) to À 139 kJ/mol (H-ZSM-22) (see also Table 1). Compared to the SMS formation from methanol, the SES formation is on average about 14 kJ/mol lower in energy which is in good agreement with an earlier study for H-ZSM-5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations