2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.205142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple proof of the detectability lemma and spectral gap amplification

Abstract: The detectability lemma is a useful tool for probing the structure of gapped ground states of frustration-free Hamiltonians of lattice spin models. The lemma provides an estimate on the error incurred by approximating the ground space projector with a product of local projectors. We provide a simpler proof for the detectability lemma which applies to an arbitrary ordering of the local projectors, and show that it is tight up to a constant factor. As an application, we show how the lemma can be combined with a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another tool that we will use is the notion of coarse-grained Hamiltonian [ALV12,AAV16]. Let Q S be the projector orthogonal to the ground space of h S .…”
Section: B2 Coarse-grained Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another tool that we will use is the notion of coarse-grained Hamiltonian [ALV12,AAV16]. Let Q S be the projector orthogonal to the ground space of h S .…”
Section: B2 Coarse-grained Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has since then become a useful tool in many-body problems. A converse result is known as the Converse Detectability Lemma [11,4], and will also be used later. At the same time as we recall them, we will reformulate them in terms of inequalities between some quadratic functionals.…”
Section: The Detectability Lemma and Its Conversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has a much simpler proof, which is given in [2]. In addition to the detectability lemma, we will use a converse statement which gives a lower bound on the norm of DL(H )|ψ .…”
Section: Definition 9 (Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the detectability lemma, we will use a converse statement which gives a lower bound on the norm of DL(H )|ψ . The converse, and its proof, appear in [2].…”
Section: Definition 9 (Thementioning
confidence: 99%