2017
DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple processing of back-contacted silicon heterojunction solar cells using selective-area crystalline growth

Abstract: For crystalline-silicon solar cells, voltages close to the theoretical limit are nowadays readily achievable when using passivating contacts. Conversely, maximal current generation requires the integration of the electron and hole contacts at the back of the solar cell to liberate its front from any shadowing loss. Recently, the world-record e ciency for crystalline-silicon singlejunction solar cells was achieved by merging these two approaches in a single device; however, the complexity of fabricating this cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
69
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[36,37] Here, the Cs 0.19 MA 0.81 PbI 3 perovskite bandgap is 1.58 eV, well below that optimal value. As recently demonstrated for the case of interdigitated back-contacted SHJ cells, [33] diffraction measurements confirmed the presence of the perovskite phase ( Figure S2, Supporting Information). [10] Considering a gain of 2 mA cm −2 in the top cell due to avoiding parasitic absorption in the spiro-OMeTAD layer and using a perovskite absorber with a bandgap of 1.63 eV (Figure 6b), a tandem cell current density of 18.4 mA cm −2 could be reached.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[36,37] Here, the Cs 0.19 MA 0.81 PbI 3 perovskite bandgap is 1.58 eV, well below that optimal value. As recently demonstrated for the case of interdigitated back-contacted SHJ cells, [33] diffraction measurements confirmed the presence of the perovskite phase ( Figure S2, Supporting Information). [10] Considering a gain of 2 mA cm −2 in the top cell due to avoiding parasitic absorption in the spiro-OMeTAD layer and using a perovskite absorber with a bandgap of 1.63 eV (Figure 6b), a tandem cell current density of 18.4 mA cm −2 could be reached.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Steady-state efficiencies of 22.0% and 21.2% during maximum power-point tracking for 1000 s, were measured (Figure 2a,b). [33] In comparison, a rear-side-textured single-junction SHJ solar cell reference for the bottom cell, comprising the nc-Si:H layer stack at the front, shows an efficiency of 16.45% with a V oc of 693 mV for an aperture area of 0.25 cm 2 ( Figure S3, Supporting Information). These tandem cells showed a high open-circuit voltage (V oc ) of >1750 mV, which demonstrates the capability of the nc-Si:H junction to efficiently recombine electrons from the top cell with holes from the bottom cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 5 shows the Raman measurements performed on compensated layer stacks to determine if there was significant crystallization of the layers in the "good compensation" regime as microcrystalline layers are necessary to form the tunnel contact, which may explain the compensation effect. 8 This would be visible in the peak around 520 cm -1 . The 15 mW and "no laser" represent the "under compensated" regime, the 17 and 24 mW laser powers represent the "good compensation" regime and the 25 and 33 mW laser powers represent the "over compensated" regime.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Compensated Layer Stacksmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One method proposed to simplify IBC patterning has been proposed by Tomasi et al by introducing a tunnel junction concept for the BSF fingers of the solar cell. 8,9 This concept allows self-alignment between the a-Si:H deposition steps. Additionally, the use of laser ablation for SHJ-IBC patterning is being investigated by various research groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%