2003
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple method to analyze SNP‐based association studies using DNA pools

Abstract: Association studies using DNA pools are in principle powerful and efficient to detect association between a marker allele and disease status, e.g., in a case-control design. A common observation with the use of DNA pools is that the two alleles at a polymorphic SNP locus are not amplified in equal amounts in heterozygous individuals. In addition, there are poolspecific experimental errors so that there is variation in the estimates of allele frequencies from different pools that are from the same individuals. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean absolute difference between frequency estimates from individual genotypes and pooled samples was .034 similar to values of .033 to .04 reported previously using the Sequenom MassARRAY (Bansal et al, 2002;Le Hellard et al, 2002;Mohlke et al, 2002;Visscher & Le Hellard, 2003). We found allele frequency estimates must be corrected for unequal amplification of alleles, but there was no significant difference when using data from two or eight heterozygous individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean absolute difference between frequency estimates from individual genotypes and pooled samples was .034 similar to values of .033 to .04 reported previously using the Sequenom MassARRAY (Bansal et al, 2002;Le Hellard et al, 2002;Mohlke et al, 2002;Visscher & Le Hellard, 2003). We found allele frequency estimates must be corrected for unequal amplification of alleles, but there was no significant difference when using data from two or eight heterozygous individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A pooling strategy reduces genotyping costs and the time required to complete large genotyping projects (Bansal et al, 2002;Hoogendoorn et al, 2000;Le Hellard et al, 2002;Mohlke et al, 2002;Sham et al, 2002;Visscher & Le Hellard, 2003). However pooling results in a loss of information because of increased errors in the experimental procedure and the loss of haplotype information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for variance due to DNA pooling, an estimate of pooling error was calculated according to Visscher and Le Hellard (48). The resulting error factor of 0.014 was then used to adjust the c 2 test statistic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending upon the magnitude of experimental error produced in the estimation of pooled allele frequencies, a classical v 2 -test statistic or an adjusted v 2 -test statistic (v adj 2 ) was used to assess the null hypothesis (Le Hellard et al 2002;Visscher and Le Hellard 2003).…”
Section: Individual Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%