2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple method of designing centralized PI controllers for multivariable systems based on SSGM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance metric ISE and ISV is given in Table 4 for the case of rejecting a sinusoidal change in output disturbance of frequency 0.1 rad/min in both of the output channels. The sinusoidal disturbance rejection property of SOF controller is comparable to that of the controller designed in [3] and [4] and superior to the one designed in [2]. From Table 4, clearly the control effort (ISV of U 1 ) is on the lower side for SOF controller when compared to other controllers.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The performance metric ISE and ISV is given in Table 4 for the case of rejecting a sinusoidal change in output disturbance of frequency 0.1 rad/min in both of the output channels. The sinusoidal disturbance rejection property of SOF controller is comparable to that of the controller designed in [3] and [4] and superior to the one designed in [2]. From Table 4, clearly the control effort (ISV of U 1 ) is on the lower side for SOF controller when compared to other controllers.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The performance of the controllers designed in [3] and [4] are similar, but consumes very large control input when compared to SOF controller. Clearly, the SOF controller outperforms the one designed in [2]. Unmeasured output sinusoidal disturbances of very small frequencies are also prominent in process control applications.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations