2005
DOI: 10.3200/socp.145.3.287-298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Method for Predicting American Presidential Greatness From Victory Margin in Popular Vote (1824-1996)

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The author tested the simple method (SM) for predicting presidential greatness (S. J. H. McCann, 1999) from the winner's victory margin in the popular vote and A. M. Schlesinger Jr.'s (1986) cycles of American political history with the expert sample presidential rankings of W. J. Ridings Jr. and S. B. McIver (1997). The SM, which involves only simple calculations on minimal data available shortly after an election, predicts greatness ratings that are above average for winners with high victory margi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the historical context in which presidents serve powerfully shapes their current standing. Our results provide insight into one of the field's core debates and contribute to the literature examining greatness ratings (in addition to Simoton's works cited above, see, e.g., Balz ; Cohen ; Curry and Morris ; McCann ; Nichols ; Simon and Uscinski ). These ratings provide one measure of presidents’ legacies.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…At the same time, the historical context in which presidents serve powerfully shapes their current standing. Our results provide insight into one of the field's core debates and contribute to the literature examining greatness ratings (in addition to Simoton's works cited above, see, e.g., Balz ; Cohen ; Curry and Morris ; McCann ; Nichols ; Simon and Uscinski ). These ratings provide one measure of presidents’ legacies.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“… There is some disciplinary crossover in this literature. McCann (1992, 1995, 2005), a psychologist, has made significant contributions to the line of research on the relationship between historical eras and presidential evaluations. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is now a voluminous literature analyzing the greatness assessments of experts (Balz 2010;Bose and Landis 2003;Curry and Morris 2010;Deluga 1998; Kenney and Rice 1988;Maranell 1970;Maranell and Dodder 1970;McCann 1992McCann , 1995McCann , 2005Newman and Davis 2016;Nice 1984;Nichols 2012;Simon and Uscinski 2012;Simonton 1987Simonton , 1991Simonton , 1992Simonton , 1993Simonton , 2001Simonton , 2002Simonton , 2006Simonton , 2008Uscinski and Simon 2011). One rationale for the analysis of rankings is their consistency over time-presidents that are rated highly in one survey tend to be rated highly in the others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%