2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple method for determining CO2 loading of partially carbonated aqueous ammonia solutions using pH and density measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density model obtained in this work is not only able to reproduce the experimental density values used for parameter estimation with an average absolute relative deviation (AARD) of 0.3%, as indicated in Table , but it can also reproduce experimental density values available in the literature for aqueous solutions containing ammonia and carbon dioxide. Figure shows the deviation of the experimental density values measured in this work and available in the literature , from the density predictions obtained with the model of eq using the parameters listed in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The density model obtained in this work is not only able to reproduce the experimental density values used for parameter estimation with an average absolute relative deviation (AARD) of 0.3%, as indicated in Table , but it can also reproduce experimental density values available in the literature for aqueous solutions containing ammonia and carbon dioxide. Figure shows the deviation of the experimental density values measured in this work and available in the literature , from the density predictions obtained with the model of eq using the parameters listed in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Relative differences Δρ/ρ = (ρ exp – ρ model) /ρ model of the experimental densities, ρ exp , of aqueous (NH 3 + CO 2 ) solutions at atmospheric pressure from values of density estimated with the model defined in eq with parameters listed in Table , as a function of (a) density ρ; (b) temperature T ; (c) apparent NH 3 concentration in solution b̂ NH 3 ; and (d) apparent CO 2 concentration in solution b̂ CO 2 : ○, this work; ◇, Stec et al; and □, Lichtfers …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the pH value affects the packing density of surfactant molecules at the interface and therefore affects the intensity of the Marangoni flow. However, the variation of ammonia concentration in a rather wide range (e.g., from 2.3 to 8.2 wt %) corresponds to the quite negligible variation in the pH value (from 9.634 to 9.609) . Thus, the role of the pH change in the active motion of the droplets at the varying ammonia concentration is not so significant compared with the corresponding change in the rate of the reaction between copper and ammonia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the variation of ammonia concentration in a rather wide range (e.g., from 2.3 to 8.2 wt %) corresponds to the quite negligible variation in the pH value (from 9.634 to 9.609). 41 Thus, the role of the pH change in the active motion of the droplets at the varying ammonia concentration is not so significant compared with the corresponding change in the rate of the reaction between copper and ammonia. Another possible method of regulating the velocity of droplet motion is the variation of the surfactant concentration in the solution.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%