Simple Method for Detection of Clostridium botulinum Type A to F Neurotoxin Genes by Ploymerase Chain Reaction

Abstract

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method was established to detect each type of neurotoxin genes of Clostridium botulinum types A to F by employing the oligonucleotide primer sets corresponding to special regions of the light chains of the neurotoxins. In this procedure, the PCR products were easily confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion profiles, and as little as 2.5 pg of template DNAs from toxigenic strains could be detected. The specific PCR products were obtained from toxigenic C. botulinum types A to F, a type E toxin-producing C. butyricum strain, and a type F toxin-producing C. baratii strain, but no PCR product was detected in nontoxigenic strains of C. botulinum and other clostridial species. The neurotoxin genes were also detected in food products of a seasoned dry salmon and a fermented fish (Izushi) which had caused type E outbreaks of botulism. Therefore, it is concluded that this PCR-based detection method can be used for the rapid diagnosis of botulism.

Genetic Characterization and Comparison of Clostridium botulinum Isolates from Botulism Cases in Japan between 2006 and 2011

“…All animal experiments were conducted with the approval of the NIID Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The presence of corresponding bont genes in these strains was confirmed using PCR methods (29,30).…”

Application of Real‐Time PCR for Quantitative Detection of Clostridium botulinum Type A Toxin Gene in Food

“…The detection of the BoNT gene by PCR has proven to be a sensitive and rapid alternative to the mouse assay (34). However, the methods using PCR are qualitative, not quantitative.…”

Complexity of Botulinum Neurotoxins: Challenges for Detection Technology

“…By far, the most commonly employed methods are PCR-based techniques (Mullis et al 1986;Saiki et al 1988), many of which aim at detecting bont genes by conventional or quantitative amplification reactions (Szabo et al 1992(Szabo et al , 1993Franciosa et al 1994Franciosa et al , 1996Fach et al 1995Fach et al , 2009Takeshi et al 1996;Aranda et al 1997;Braconnier et al 2001;Kimura et al 2001;Craven et al 2002;Popoff and Walker 2003;Akbulut et al 2004;Takeda et al 2005;Yoon et al 2005;Lindström and Korkeala 2006;Artin et al 2007;Fenicia et al 2007;Heffron and Poxton 2007;Prévot et al 2007;Sánchez-Hernández et al 2008;Sakuma et al 2009;Hill et al 2010;Lindberg et al 2010;Takahashi et al 2010). Since conventional PCR is difficult to quantify and requires a post-PCR step to visualize and to verify the PCR product, many modern approaches use quantitative PCR (qPCR) formats.…”