2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.103.205129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple linear response model for predicting energy band alignment of two-dimensional vertical heterostructures

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The band alignment diagrams of the 25 types of 2D monolayers considered in this work are shown in Figure 2A which provides a qualitative understanding on the contact type and band alignment formation via Anderson rule (AR) which does not include any interface interaction effect. [80] Due to the finite interaction between the two constituent monolayers, [81] AR may no longer be valid in vdWHs with sizable interlayer coupling and interface dipole. [82,83] As shown in Figure 2B, AR remains valid for most of the metallic TMDC, graphene, InSe, hBN, and MA 2 Z 4 family due to their weak coupling nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band alignment diagrams of the 25 types of 2D monolayers considered in this work are shown in Figure 2A which provides a qualitative understanding on the contact type and band alignment formation via Anderson rule (AR) which does not include any interface interaction effect. [80] Due to the finite interaction between the two constituent monolayers, [81] AR may no longer be valid in vdWHs with sizable interlayer coupling and interface dipole. [82,83] As shown in Figure 2B, AR remains valid for most of the metallic TMDC, graphene, InSe, hBN, and MA 2 Z 4 family due to their weak coupling nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%