2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple Index Tests for Assessing the Recompression Index of Fine-Grained Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the C s data (FI-CLAY/14/856) is marked with greater scatter compared to C c and CR. Nevertheless, the model suggested by Kootahi (2017) fits rather well with the data, and the bias factor b is approximately 1 (Table 2). On contrary, the relationship between PI and C s was characterised by larger scatter (see Figure S3 in the supplement); accordingly, calibration yielded very high δ values.…”
Section: Comparison Of Existing Transformation Models To Fi-clay/14/856mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Similarly, the C s data (FI-CLAY/14/856) is marked with greater scatter compared to C c and CR. Nevertheless, the model suggested by Kootahi (2017) fits rather well with the data, and the bias factor b is approximately 1 (Table 2). On contrary, the relationship between PI and C s was characterised by larger scatter (see Figure S3 in the supplement); accordingly, calibration yielded very high δ values.…”
Section: Comparison Of Existing Transformation Models To Fi-clay/14/856mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In this study, we paid more attention to the uncertainty prevailing at a particular location (local uncertainty), rather than the uncertainty assessed at many locations simultaneously (multiple-point or spatial uncertainty). 19 However, currently most correlations whether based on simple algebraic, statistical methods or advanced ML methods, neglected uncertainty induced by measurement scatter (data from different laboratories/ resources) and limited number of samples, [20][21][22] meaning their predictions were deterministic without uncertainty evaluation. 23 Because direct application of their predicted results in engineering practice may pose risks, correlations that take uncertainty into account through ML are worth studying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation of soil physical and mechanical properties is an inevitable step in geotechnical design for achieving the trade-off between the cost and engineering safety, such as the estimation of bearing capacity and long-term deformation., and Site-specific laboratory testing is the most direct way of obtaining soil properties. For a certain type of soils, empirical or semiempirical correlations have been developed for use in predicting soil properties [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, these conventional regression-based correlations have limited prediction capabilities and cannot uncover the essential interconnections between input variables and the studied soil properties, hindering the development of a general prediction model and the use of existing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%