2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple discrimination reversals in the domestic horse (Equus caballus): Effect of discriminative stimulus modality on learning to learn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine if the horses were using spatial cues or brightness cues to complete the reversal task, Martin, Zentall, and Lawrence (2006) compared horses in a "visual" reversal learning condition to horses in a "spatial" reversal learning condition and found that horses in the spatial group made fewer and fewer errors over the course of six trials. Horses in the visual group struggled to even learn the initial discrimination task and were not subject to any reversal trials (Martin et al, 2006). Other studies have suggested that horses struggle with both basic discrimination and reversal learning based on visual characteristics of stimuli compared to spatial stimuli -although horses can often learn to discriminate visual cues with additional training (Hothersall et al, 2010).…”
Section: Reversal Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine if the horses were using spatial cues or brightness cues to complete the reversal task, Martin, Zentall, and Lawrence (2006) compared horses in a "visual" reversal learning condition to horses in a "spatial" reversal learning condition and found that horses in the spatial group made fewer and fewer errors over the course of six trials. Horses in the visual group struggled to even learn the initial discrimination task and were not subject to any reversal trials (Martin et al, 2006). Other studies have suggested that horses struggle with both basic discrimination and reversal learning based on visual characteristics of stimuli compared to spatial stimuli -although horses can often learn to discriminate visual cues with additional training (Hothersall et al, 2010).…”
Section: Reversal Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horses that were faster at learning the reversal were rated as more trainable by an independent trainer (Fiske and Potter, 1979). To determine if the horses were using spatial cues or brightness cues to complete the reversal task, Martin, Zentall, and Lawrence (2006) compared horses in a "visual" reversal learning condition to horses in a "spatial" reversal learning condition and found that horses in the spatial group made fewer and fewer errors over the course of six trials. Horses in the visual group struggled to even learn the initial discrimination task and were not subject to any reversal trials (Martin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Reversal Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the degree of improvement relative to baseline should be a measure of the animal's cognitive flexibility (Bitterman, 1975). Research has shown that a variety of animals, including apes and monkeys (Beran, Klein, Evans, Chan, Flemming, Harris et al, 2008;Warren, 1966), horses (Martin, Zentall, & Lawrence, 2006), rats (Bushnell & Stanton, 1991;Reid & Morris, 1992), and birds (Bond, Kamil, & Balda, 2007;Ploog & Williams, 2010), show substantial improvement with reversals, which suggests that this type of flexibility has adaptive value (Shettleworth, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, horses were trained to respond to a stimulus and tested to determine how quickly they learned to adjust if the reward was reversed (the reward was removed from the initial stimulus and associated with a previous neutral stimulus). This study used both lights and objects as conditioned stimulus and suggested that horses learned better from object discrimination rather than light stimulus (41) .…”
Section: Horsesmentioning
confidence: 99%