2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.05.535396
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An emerging view of neural geometry in motor cortex supports high-performance decoding

Abstract: Decoders for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) assume constraints on neural activity, chosen to reflect scientific beliefs while yielding tractable computations. We document how low tangling – a typical property of motor-cortex neural trajectories – yields unusual neural geometries. We designed a decoder, MINT, to embrace appropriate statistical constraints for these geometries. MINT takes a trajectory-centric approach: a library of neural trajectories (rather than a set of neural dimensions) provides a scaffol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the population neural dynamics mostly explored nearly linear regions of the neural manifolds. This finding is consistent with our results demonstrating the ability to linearly decode EMG signals from relatively few linear latent variables, and provides a manifoldbased understanding of the surprising effectiveness of linear methods in decoding the motor output in brain-machine interfaces 42,43,60,80 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the population neural dynamics mostly explored nearly linear regions of the neural manifolds. This finding is consistent with our results demonstrating the ability to linearly decode EMG signals from relatively few linear latent variables, and provides a manifoldbased understanding of the surprising effectiveness of linear methods in decoding the motor output in brain-machine interfaces 42,43,60,80 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Linear decoding is based on a weighted sum of neural signals; it is thus the projection of collective neural activity along a specific direction in the neural state space. Although this widely used approach 42,43,61 has been superseded by nonlinear and recurrent alternatives 43,[79][80][81] , linear decoders are simple, interpretable, and effective, and provide a useful tool for hypothesis testing. In this study, we were interested not in the absolute EMG decoding accuracy achieved when all neurons are used as inputs, but in the relative accuracy achieved when only the latent variables associated with the low-dimensional manifolds are used as inputs.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MSLR manages to reflect the non-stationarity and regime shifts often present in behavioural data (43– 46), by flexibly accommodating complex temporal dynamics while keeping a relative simplicity, compared to deep learning-based methods (47). Moreover, the MSLR is less data-hungry than other common data-driven models (4850). The MSLR uses the ‘pre-stimulus’ facial features to predict the animals’ reaction time (RT) by assuming ‘hidden’ states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to LFADS, NDT refers to Neural Data Transformers, a non-recurrent neural network similar to LFADS that replaces the RNN encoder decoder with Transformer instead [52]. MINT refers to "mesh of idealized neural trajectories" [53]. It simply uses a state-transition lookup table to model the latent dynamics and proposes two conditional functions to jointly model both spiking activity and the behavioral statistics.…”
Section: Plos Computational Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%