Proceedings of 2003 IEEE Conference on Control Applications, 2003. CCA 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/cca.2003.1223179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple counting rule for optimal data fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority logic rule is considered for equal-weight combining, as suggested in [4]. For the optimal combining, we consider two cases: the ideal case when the fusion center knows all the required probabilities and the case when the counting method in [6] is applied to estimate the probabilities. The duration of H 1 period and H 0 period are assumed to follow geometric distribution with mean of 150 and 200 samples, respectively [7].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority logic rule is considered for equal-weight combining, as suggested in [4]. For the optimal combining, we consider two cases: the ideal case when the fusion center knows all the required probabilities and the case when the counting method in [6] is applied to estimate the probabilities. The duration of H 1 period and H 0 period are assumed to follow geometric distribution with mean of 150 and 200 samples, respectively [7].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these are generally unknown to the fusion center, the optimal combining is hard to implement. In [6], a counting method was proposed to estimate the probabilities. However, the counting method may be inaccurate, when the number of data is insufficient and/or the channel is time-varying.…”
Section: Optimal Combiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to implement this rule, the probabilities of detection and false alarm must be known. In [5] and [6], two iterative algorithms are proposed to estimate the probabilities of detection and false alarm, but both of them respond slowly when the system is changed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P di and P f i of each SU are estimated by the spectrum coordinator using the counting rule by comparing the local sensing results with global or fused results [21].…”
Section: P DImentioning
confidence: 99%